Thread Content
All moderators, please read the following before receiving your salaries. Thank you! Summary for March 2016: 1. There were many cases of removal from duty and resignations in this month; moderators who were removed from duty or resigned were evaluated according to the regional system. A final reminder: those who take leave for two consecutive months and receive unsatisfactory evaluations in terms of performance management will be treated as having resigned. Please, moderators on leave, arrange your time accordingly. 2. Regarding the daily question: All questions, except those posted on the same day, will not be promoted, recommended, or pinned. Highlight and bold for one week, then turn it off after a week (make sure to announce the answers). Please note: In April, aside from the release of the “Daily Exercise Questions,” “Joint Learning*” will no longer be published. 3. The improvement lines for certain sections in the regions are not updated in a timely manner; some of these improvement lines have reached page four or even page five. Moreover, there are quite a few section moderators. It seems that with more moderators, everyone tends to rely on waiting and others. 4. Several new users posted advertising content in the technical area this month. If it contains technical content, the illegal parts can be removed while keeping the technical sections; if it is posted multiple times or is a product introduction by a manufacturer, it can be deleted. Please note, moderators, to remind the users when managing. 5. The forum awards a certain amount of souvenirs to each region every year. These regions are selected based on the number of times they have produced outstanding moderators; in case there is a tie, the one who achieved it first is given priority. After a comprehensive evaluation, the list is submitted to the relevant region for rewards. 6. Notes on assessment: Based on the recent data from the forum, the regional assessment criteria have been adjusted as follows: The monthly assessment is determined based on the comprehensive management score, with a score of 500 or above indicating a qualified moderator ; A comprehensive score of 300 points or above qualifies one as an approved moderator ; A comprehensive score of 150 points or above indicates a moderator who needs to make more efforts ; A moderator with a comprehensive score of 150 or below is considered unqualified. For actual moderators, no assessment is carried out during that month; however, those who reach the status of qualified moderator or above are subject to actual assessment and rewards. Calculation of the comprehensive management score: Number of posts posted * 3 + Number of management actions * 1. 7. Adjustments regarding rewards: Outstanding moderators ; Monthly reward ; +1 reputation/+20 charm/+999 wealth – Good moderator ; Reward ; +10 Charm/+600~990 Wealth. Qualified moderators: Monthly reward: +5 Charm/+400~800 Wealth. Moderator to be motivated: Reward: +2 Charm/+100~500 Wealth. Unqualified moderator: Reward: 0–300 wealth. 8. Articles 6 and 7 will come into effect in April; all moderators are requested to pay attention. Other assessments remain unchanged. (Also: Moderators who are considering taking part-time jobs in other sections, please indicate this when replying.) ) Management Team Evaluation: Section, Username, Management Level, Posts in the Last 30 Days, Management Performance This Month, Special Rewards (Charm), Part-time Rewards (Charm), Rewards for Qualified Moderators/Deputy Super Moderators (Charm), Management Rewards (Wealth), Duty-based Rewards (Charm), Reward Prestige, Monthly Evaluation. Production and Management Zone: zlky2005, Moderator, 13, 13, , , , 400, , Resigned; Wang Tianze, Moderator, 119, 1094, , , 10, 990, 20, 1, Excellent. Production Site Management Section: liang164973958, Moderator, 27, 206, , , , 460, 6, Qualified; *aojiaoya0546, Moderator, 179, 1554, 10, 10, , 990, 20, 1, Excellent; li*nji, Moderator, 20, 128, , , , 150, 3, Needs Improvement; chenlaid, Moderator, 0, 0, , , , , , Resigned; wsm1988, Moderator, 231, 11, , , , 810, 10, Good; guo*nfang, Moderator, 35, 287, , 10, 800, 6, Qualified. Engineering Project Management Section: huoshanwang3, Moderator, 20, 14, , , , 150, , Unqualified; lxzjcbx, Moderator, 12, 8, , , , 50, , Unqualified; lucifer20009, Moderator, 10, 211, , , , 400, 3, Needs Improvement; wenlong0207, Moderator, 16, 0, , , , 500, , Resigned. Control Systems Discussion Zone: normalboy, Moderator, 28, 159, , , , 370, 3, Needs Improvement; sha*jiang, Moderator, 49, 44, , , , 100, 3, Needs Improvement; chensf123, Moderator, 37, 554, , , , 820, 10, Good; sdllxg, Moderator, 21, 39, , , , 240, , Unqualified; zxb1990, Moderator, 37, 651, , 10, 840, 10, Good; fffsusan, Moderator, 33, 136, , , , 320, 3, Needs Improvement; wang*aoqiang0, Moderator, 26, 190, , , , 400, 6, Qualified; budaoweng123, Moderator, 220, 255, , 10, 850, 10, Good; sui*nyuqq, Moderator, 23, 9, , , , 150, , Unqualified. Instruments and Meters Discussion Zone: *aojiaoya0546, Moderator, 179, 1554, , 10, 990, 20, 1, Excellent; 870471450, Moderator, 386, 72, , , , 890, 10, Good; Fengxiao, Moderator, 1, 0, , , , 150, , Removed from post; zxb1990, Moderator, 37, 651, , 10, 10, 840, 10, Good; Tian Siyu, Moderator, 19, 42, , , , 230, , Unqualified; tongjun123, Moderator, 43, 0, , , , 290, , Unqualified; shrien, Moderator, 9, 51, , 10, 170, , Unqualified; gydcm, Moderator, 14, 38, , , , 170, , Unqualified; dennyshen2549, Moderator, 68, 430, , , , 810, 10, Good. Electrical Engineering Discussion Zone: jennifer12580, Moderator, 34, 2438, , 10, 990, 20, 1, Excellent; hesonchang214, Moderator, 307, 4149, 10, 10, , 990, 20, 1, Excellent; Wei Feng921, Moderator, 3, 0, , , , 200, , Resigned; shrien, Moderator, 9, 51, , 10, 170, , Unqualified. Quality and Technical Management Section: ls19860713, Moderator, 70, 1162, 10, , 10, 940, 10, Good. Civil Engineering and Structures Discussion Zone: hesonchang214, Moderator, 307, 4149, 10, 10, 10, 990, 20, 1, Excellent; huoshanwang3, Moderator, 20, 14, , , , 140, , Unqualified; jindaowenwu, Moderator, 8, 0, , , , 300, , Resigned. HVAC and Thermal Energy Discussion Zone: xuexmxj, Moderator, 0, 0, , , , , , Resigned; hjztbwg, Moderator, 17, 325, 5, , 10, 770, 6, Qualified; symc, Moderator, 5, 0, , , , 260, , Removed from post. Storage and Transportation Technology Discussion Zone: hnan, Moderator, 398, 603, , , , 990, 10, Good; trant323, Moderator, 136, 168, , , , 800, 10, Good; Bohe Rensheng, Moderator, 43, 98, , 5, 260, 3, Needs Improvement. Technical Team Evaluation: Username, Current Section, All Sections, Rewards, Monthly Evaluation, Number of Topics, Number of Posts, Number of Topics, Number of Posts, Wealth, Charm, Prestige. humker, Control, , , , , , , Removed from post; Qingqing Zijin_, Control, 9, 9, 100, , , ; whimwhim, Control, 23, 16, 46, 330, 6, ; Wu Xinren, Instruments, , , , , , , Removed from post; feng*aosa, Instruments, , , , , , , Removed from post; Xiaoyao Tenglong, Instruments, 4, 172, 26, 276, 900, 30, 1, Excellent; llu85, Production, , , , , , , Removed from post. Issues requiring clarification: 1. Should there be any errors in my statistics, please contact me promptly so that I can make corrections. Technical team-related posts are mainly posted in this region. 2. Those who have objections to the salary posts are requested to get in touch promptly. This post is dedicated to discussions about salaries; if giving ratings to each other, it should be at most 1 unit of wealth. Attention all moderators. The management team should use the following format: Please reply in accordance with this format for indicating your salary: This month’s salary: Reputation + Charm + Wealth. Monthly summary: Suggestions or plans for this section or region: (A maximum reward of 10 Quills is available for responses to this item.) The technical team should also use the following format: Please reply in accordance with this format for indicating your salary: This month’s salary: Reputation + Charm + Wealth. Monthly summary: Suggestions or plans for this section or region: (A maximum reward of 10 Quills is available for responses to this item.)