HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Issues related to the weld qualification process for plug-in stainless steel nozzles and composite plate shells

2016-04-29View Original

Thread Content

Seeking help: The thickness of the austenitic stainless steel nozzle is 6 mm, while the thickness of the composite plate cylinder is 20+3 mm. How should the welding procedure be evaluated for the welds of this plug-in nozzle?
Reply #22016-04-29
Get an evaluation form; each part should be covered. . . For example, use a 12+3 board for connection. . . In this way, stainless steel covers 1.5–6, while carbon steel covers 12–24. . Use different welding materials for different purposes; use a transition welding material for the transition layer. .
Reply #32016-04-29
I think two evaluations are needed: one for the butt joint of the composite plate, and another for surfacing welding. For example, you can choose ① Evaluation of 20+3 butt joint, or ② Surfacing welding on the base layer (using a transition layer weld rod for the first layer and a stainless steel weld rod for the second layer?) ) Also, for welders working on the transition layer, surfacing work is required

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.