Thread Content
The last edit to this post was made by yinkuilin6868 on 2016-5-17 at 15:05. 1. Acting as a leader – Safety supervision officers who go to the production sites are often addressed as leaders by workshop supervisors and workers. However, for those in charge of safety supervision, acting as a leader is a major obstacle to doing their job well. One must remain vigilant at all times and strive to enhance their sense of service. As a member of the safety management team, it is necessary to go to the work sites to conduct investigations, listen patiently to opinions from all parties, and pool the collective wisdom in order to solve the problems encountered in safety management within the workshop. 2. The “one-cable” approach: This approach is the \"nemesis\" of safety production supervisors. The key to helping such supervisors overcome this misconception lies in changing their working methods – shifting from the \"one-cable\" approach to a hierarchical supervision method that focuses on key routes and key personnel. To change the approach of safety production supervisors on-site, it is sufficient to focus on superficial issues such as the failure to wear safety helmets or work uniforms. As safety supervision and production management personnel, it is necessary to constantly keep track of the key issues that affect safe production in each department and at each workplace, at different times and stages. They must supervise the fulfillment of responsibilities by key personnel, assist the primary safety officers in each department in overseeing overall safe production matters, and provide timely feedback to management. Secondly, it is necessary to supervise the primary person responsible for safety in the workshop to grant appropriate authority and delegation to their safety officers; this serves as a benchmark for ensuring that the primary safety officer fulfills his/her responsibilities at all levels, and it is also a prerequisite for safety officers in various departments to carry out their work. 3. Lack of objective judgment: Safety production supervisors encounter various types of people in their work, and are constantly confronted with pressures from different interests and emotions. If they act without principles at work, hesitate to manage boldly, refrain from offering criticism, or even show favoritism toward their superiors, they will be lenient in imposing punishments, show excessive kindness, form cliques, give preferential treatment to their close friends, and include personal biases when reporting matters to their superiors. These principle-less practices will not only render work on safety production supervision and management a mere formality. 4. Superficial attitude and preoccupation with daily tasks: Safety production supervisors have the dual responsibilities of management and oversight. Some of these supervisors believe that taking on this role means moving away from the work site to work as managers, with their main task being to spend time in the office, content with handling routine administrative tasks. Visiting the site is a superficial approach; there is no serious consideration of the provisions of regulations and systems, nor of how they are put into practice in reality, let alone an exploration of the new problems arising from new technologies and processes. They only shout slogans; their speeches are neither targeted nor actionable. Their management is superficial, and their technical expertise is behind the times. 5. Reporting only the good news and not the bad: Some departments clearly have various problems in terms of safety management, but when safety supervision officers report to their superiors, they focus on the positive aspects, mentioning more advantages and fewer shortcomings; they highlight achievements while downplaying problems. As a result, senior managers assume that the situation is excellent, which leads to biased decision-making. Issues that should have been addressed promptly fail to receive adequate attention, and contradictions and the truth are concealed. 6. Hesitancy in management and deception of superiors and subordinates: Safety production supervision and management departments are afraid to take firm action, correct violations, or exercise effective oversight regarding certain behaviors, individuals, or situations that violate rules and regulations. Instead, they seek to maintain balance or even cover up issues. In some specific tasks, they resort to deception and fraud, which contributes to an increase in violations of safety rules, eventually leading to accidents. Safety work is a technical field that is highly comprehensive, scientific, and practical. To ensure safe production, it is not sufficient to issue a few documents, hold a few meetings, or come up with some figures in order to solve the problems; instead, significant effort must be put into actual action. It is essential to eliminate practices that involve plenty of slogans but little real action, much talking but little doing, and many ideas but little implementation. 7. Laypeople’s involvement in safety management: Safety management is a serious science that involves both technical aspects and managerial skills. It requires continuous learning, improvement, and innovation so that meetings, speeches, and actions can be effective; only then will people pay attention, and command and control will function properly. Safety management cannot rely on theoretical discussions alone – one must truly understand the processes, equipment, environment, and people involved. Only by knowing both oneself and the enemy can one take the initiative in safety management. 8. No inspection, no tracking. Safety management is a long-term and arduous task that requires constant attention; there can be no moment of relaxation. This demands that the management authorities conduct regular inspections, ensure implementation, and promote corrective actions. Because without inspection, one cannot know where the potential problems lie, and it is impossible to urge the relevant departments to make corrections. Moreover, conducting inspections without following up on the status of those corrections is equivalent to not carrying out any inspections at all. In the end, it was just a formality, something done for show. 9. Unrealism: When policies and regulations are issued by higher authorities, each unit must, in the process of implementing them, develop practical rules that take into account its own specific circumstances. Only in this way can those policies be effectively implemented and yield results. It is not acceptable to act in a manner that ignores reality, or to come up with untested ideas on a whim and rush to put them into practice; such an approach results in a great deal of effort being wasted without achieving any actual outcomes. 10. Violations by safety management personnel: Intentional or unintentional violations by safety management personnel are matters that cannot be taken lightly, as they have extremely severe consequences and cause great harm. When employees see safety violations being ignored, and you then go after them, they will develop a rebellious attitude. As the saying goes, “To forge iron, one must first be strong oneself.” If one cannot do it oneself, how can one rightfully demand it of others? Once such a situation arises, it is difficult to reverse its effects; ultimately, lax management is imposed, creating invisible risks to safe production.