HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

In the 2016 Chemical Engineering case study, in the afternoon, there was a net suction head for the pump – is it necessary to make corrections?

2016-09-05View Original

Thread Content

The calculated value for NPSHa is 5.01 meters; the possible answers are 4.0 meters, 4.5 meters, and 4.9 meters, with the other option being unreliable. I took into account a 0.5-meter margin and chose 4.5 meters. It also comes closest to 5.01 - 0.5 when calculated. Is the term used in the question “net suction head” referred to as “NPSHr”? The proposer should specify how much of a correction is needed, 0.3 meters or 0.5 meters. "The net positive suction head of a pump is divided into the required net positive suction head (also known as the necessary net positive suction head), denoted as NPSHr (NPSH Required) or NPSHR, and the available net positive suction head (also known as the effective net positive suction head), denoted as NPSHa (NPSH Available)."
Reply #22016-09-05
No correction is needed; with g=10, the result is 4.9
Reply #32016-09-05
I got the same result as the original poster; I made corrections to get values that are closer to 4 and 5
Reply #42016-09-05
This post was last edited by tjuliusuan on 2016-9-5 at 15:29; the value of 1000/9.8 is simply taken from that of a book
Reply #52016-09-05
No correction is needed; if one is required, a margin value will be provided for you, as the association’s margin is 0.3M.
Reply #62016-09-05
How did I get a result of 5? 01 then
Reply #72016-09-05
I also got 5.01. I calculated it N times back and forth; I really don’t want to lose points on this type of question. In the end, 4.9 was chosen
Reply #82016-09-05
I hope I won’t get another question wrong; oh no, my performance wasn’t that good to begin with
Reply #92016-09-05
I also got 5.01, with each step accurate to four decimal places; the closest value is obtained by subtracting 0.5m. Hesitated for a long time between 4.9 and 4.5……
Reply #102016-09-05
But in the association’s handbook, G is always set to 9.81 when doing calculations

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.