Thread Content
The highly sophisticated “draft for comments” presents us with a grand blueprint for the development of a socialized safety production service system. Setting aside the extensive general introductory text, what is actually presented are the notable measures such as \"abolishment\" and \"merger\"... 1. Abolishing the administrative licensing procedures for approving the qualifications of safety assessment agencies, work safety inspection and testing agencies, and occupational health assessment and testing agencies is a trend advocated by the State Council and an inevitable outcome of the development of modern social management. What is said in the text seems to reflect a sense of attachment, yet also helplessness. This has to be let go. “The cancellation of the approval process for institutional qualifications means that the \"golden age\" brought about by these qualification certificates is coming to an end. In the future, professional technical service agencies will surely rely on factors such as their capability levels, technological innovation, scale of services, and product quality to generate profits and continue to develop. 2. What will happen to these professional technical service agencies after they are released? **Qualification requirements are established by the Safety Supervision Bureau; after verifying whether they meet these requirements, the institution announces to the public that it fulfills the conditions and is now ready to commence operations! How to regulate? The whole society has its eyes on it. Of course, **regulation is also applied, with an emphasis on “regulation during and after the event.” The specific provision states, “Change single administrative supervision to dual supervision by the administration and society.” ”Also, a lot was said about industry self-discipline and integrity building – could this be accelerated...? This is in line with the development patterns of social service institutions and international practices. 3. Of course, “registered safety engineer firms” also have **specified requirements for starting operations; everyone is welcome to get involved.” The document proposes to establish criteria and plans for setting up firms of registered safety engineers, in order to support such firms in providing socialized services related to work safety. ”It’s just that the idea of establishing a “Registered Safety Engineer Firm” has been around for many years; as for what it was like in the past, the current situation, and the future prospects... well, we’ll talk about that another time. 4. It is particularly noteworthy that the qualification for safety assessment specialists will be abolished by the end of 2018, and these professionals will be incorporated into the category of registered safety engineers. ”Hehe… What is still fresh in my memory is that in 2010, the **(Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security and the State Administration of Work Safety) planned to merge (also known as integrate) the roles of ‘safety assessment specialists’ and ‘registered safety engineers’ within three years. How to merge? Under investigation… It’s not possible to merge now, so let’s go for a drastic solution: “Cancel”. Wow, that’s good; it’s even more convenient. I’d like to ask gently: as someone who is involved in establishing a human resources system for safe production at the industry level, can simply \"rejecting,\" \"overturning,\" or \"abolishing\" the legal professional qualification of safety assessors really help to \"improve,\" \"promote,\" or \"implement\" another professional qualification – namely the system of registered safety engineers? 5. Study it carefully in depth: “Repealing the safety assessment specialist role” actually means “merging” rather than “repealing”. Develop a human resources system for creating a unified social service system for work safety, incorporating \"safety assessors\" into the management system for \"registered safety engineers\" in order to manage them in a categorized and itemized manner. The idea is good; actual implementation still requires effort. “Replacing the role of safety assessment specialists does not mean eliminating them as a category; rather, it eliminates the separate, equal, and unrelated \"relationship\" that existed between them and registered safety engineers, placing these safety assessment specialists within the broader framework of human resources management in the field of safety production technology services. 6. Over the years, calls for “merger” and “cancellation” have been constant. The reason for this is external: “Registered Safety Engineers” are under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Human Resources, while “Safety Assessment Specialists” fall under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Labor and Social Security. The Ministry of Personnel and the Ministry of Labor were merged into the \"Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security\", and the functions of various bureaus had to be \"merged\", so... Internal: The Department of Planning and Science and Technology under the State Administration of Work Safety is in charge of “safety assessment” matters ； The Personnel Department of the State Administration of Work Safety is responsible for talent development and undertakes the task of \"overseeing and guiding the professional qualification examinations for registered safety engineers as well as their registration processes\"; its responsibilities also extend to safety assessment professionals. But those who pay close attention and do some research online will find that the \"Regulations on the Main Responsibilities, Internal Organizations, and Staffing of the State Administration for Work Safety\" issued by the General Office of the State Council in 2005 (Guo Ban Fa [2005] No. 11) does not grant any authority to manage professional qualifications. Moreover, safety assessors are professional roles listed in the **Professional Directory – how could such roles be abolished arbitrarily! It is very important to administer affairs in accordance with the law. 7. In summary, the emergence of \"safety assessment specialists\" is due to the fact that the \"Work Safety Law\" mandates safety assessment activities, which require personnel with specialized skills to carry out. These professionals are known as “safety assessors” and have been recognized as a social profession in our country. Currently included in the latest \"Classification of Occupations of the People’s Republic of China\" (2015 edition), there are nearly 30,000 safety assessment professionals nationwide. “The title of \"Registered Safety Engineer\" is a professional qualification created to establish a human resources system for safety production technologies. It is strongly promoted by the State Administration of Work Safety and has been included in the provisions of the Work Safety Law, giving it legal recognition as a professional title; currently, there are around 200,000 such engineers. From a system architecture perspective, the two are not at the same level. It would be a very bad thing if system designers, transaction managers, and various professionals did not have a clear understanding of the fundamentals. For example, the skit \"Guan Gong battles Qin Qiong\", or Guo Degang… I’ll not talk about him; he’s facing some troubles these days, haha. 8. Should one still take the exam to become a \"safety assessment specialist\"? In the current atmosphere of turmoil, it is difficult to give advice, but one can consider the following question: Will the provisions regarding \"safety assessments\" in the Work Safety Law be abolished? “Does a \"safety assessment\" require specialized technical skills and professional qualifications? “Can “safety assessment” be replaced by “safety consultation” and “safety testing”? How are the qualification requirements for safety assessment agencies determined (are all of these roles to be filled by registered safety engineers)? Whether it is a \"Registered Safety Engineer\" or a \"Safety Assessment Specialist\", although it appears to be a certificate, in essence they are individuals with the necessary knowledge and skills. It is these talents who serve enterprises, **, and society by putting their skills to use. We pay too much attention to formality, to obtaining certificates, and to the benefits and honors that come with them. What is overlooked is the fundamental element in building a socialized service system for safe production – talents with the necessary capabilities and professional skills.