Dianchi Lake’s pollution control target has been missed, with an investment of 50 billion in 20 years, and the water quality is still worse than Category 5
Thread Content
“Dianchi Lake is clear and Kunming is prosperous. ”This is a recited saying by Kunming people, which reflects their longing and high hopes for the management of the "Mother Lake" Dianchi Lake. However, "clearing Dianchi Lake" is not easy. Since the mid-1990s, the * * With the support of the government, Yunnan Province and Kunming City have been making great efforts to manage Dianchi Lake and have achieved certain results, but there is still a long way to go to meet people's expectations. Dianchi Lake is a mirror, reflecting the changes, gains and losses in local development methods
This post was last edited by qugd on 2016-9-18 11:43 In terms of the development of a city and the ecological status of a lake, Kunming is very big and Dianchi Lake is very small. Kunming has grown from a total population of 3.75 million in the 1980s to now (2014 data) with an urban population of 4.58 million and a total population of 6.63 million. The city size, population, construction, industry, municipal services, etc. are all expanding, but the area of Dianchi Lake is shrinking. This data is the population change of Kunming City: Total population in years, urban population in 10,000, 1980 375 154 1990 426 161? 2000 480 181 2005 608 294 2014 663 458 Investing in governance may not necessarily have good results, but not investing in governance will only make things worse. If a city wants to develop and people's living standards improve, sometimes it has to pay a price. This price is first of all the price of the living environment, because the living environment is relatively low-cost and is easily destroyed. * * and the cost accepted by the public. Governance of the environment is a reasonable requirement when people's living standards improve, but the process and results of governance may not be satisfactory.
50 billion, will it be used wisely? The growth rate of urban population and environmental pollution are far greater than the rate of environmental governance.
Are you sure 50 billion? Are you sure you really spent it? Did you spend it on environmental protection?