In CO generation technology, the higher the CO content in the raw gas, the better
Thread Content
This post was last edited by wyji110 on 2016-9-21 07:48. The process requires only CO as the feed gas; it is desirable that the purity of CO in the crude gas produced directly by the generator be as high as possible, ideally above 96%. A pressure swing adsorption unit is not wanted. The gas consumption for CO is 10–100 Nm3/h; is there such a technology?
There is a carbon monoxide processing unit with a capacity of 250 cubic meters! The purity can currently reach 99.9%! It is necessary to add WeChat at puhua121
Pressure swing adsorption purification is now highly mature in terms of technology. We have applied it in both acetic acid and ethylene glycol-related projects. The original poster can send the specific parameters to my email scly8844@163.com so we can discuss them together.
Is pressure swing adsorption necessary? What is the purity of the raw gas produced directly by the generator?
If you really want to do this, would it be convenient to leave your contact information?
The CO produced directly as a result of gasification is generally around 62
Then a dry powder gasification furnace would be the best choice. The CO content in the crude gas produced by dry powder gasification can reach 65% (this value also depends on the type of coal), while it’s only around 45% for coal slurry. In fixed-bed gasification, the gasification pressure is low, resulting in a higher methane content, and separation processes become more complicated. As for a CO content of 96%, it is likely necessary to use pressure swing adsorption to achieve such a level; the amount of CO required in your case is at most 2400 NM3/h, which is relatively small. Using an industrial-scale gasification furnace for this purpose would be an overkill. I suggest looking into small devices that combine gasification and adsorption functions.
In the exhaust gases from calcium carbide furnaces, the CO concentration can exceed 70%