Thread Content
I saw this post, and there was active discussion among the users. Some said it’s about alignment, some mentioned calibration, and others talked about balancing. Everyone shared their opinions on which of these three methods is more professional and what the differences are._? What is this technician doing exactly? Guess it http://bbs.hcbbs.com/mobcent/app/web/index.php?r=webapp/share&tid=1625340&forumKey=keW6W0YvQwySXX6b5L
In the technology section, active participation in discussions is encouraged; meaningless replies will result in point deductions
Alignment is one thing; it involves measuring the cross-sectional gap of the coupling as well as the inclination of its two axes. Balance, however, is different; it refers to the amount by which the center of gravity of a component deviates from the center of rotation, as measured by a balance machine.
It seems that balancing is done by the manufacturing plant – is that smart?
Alignment is about getting things in proper position, while balance is dynamic
Laser alignment instrument; alignment includes centering and level deviation.
Balance is divided into dynamic balance and static balance. Dynamic balancing is usually available only from manufacturers or specialized maintenance agencies.
Neutralization and alignment are the same thing; they both serve to ensure the coaxiality of the driving and driven rotors; Balance refers to checking the offset of the rotor’s overall center of gravity relative to the axis.
For those requiring balance at the time of leaving the factory, the manufacturer will handle it. During subsequent use, if dynamic balancing is required, one can go to the manufacturing factory or contact other factories that can carry out this task; it’s just a matter of cost.
Neutralization and alignment are the same thing. Balance refers to the static and dynamic balance of the rotor, as well as high-speed dynamic balance