HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Issues regarding the butt joint between the tube box stub and the tube box flange

2016-12-09View Original

Thread Content

The thickness of the heat exchanger tube box stub is greater than the thickness of the smaller end of the long-neck flange connected to it, and is roughly equal to the thickness of the larger end of the flange. What should be done in this situation? Should the flange be made with equal thicknesses at both ends, or should the tube box stub be trimmed? The thickness of the tube box stub is 40 mm, while the thickness of the larger end of the flange is 36 mm and that of the smaller end is 24 mm
Reply #22016-12-10
It would be best to have images and explanations; I’m not clear about big-endian and little-endian
Reply #32016-12-12
So is the flange the same thickness on both the large and small ends? Wouldn’t that make it a non-standard flange?

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.