HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Another rule for stress evaluation in ASME B31.3 Appendix P

2024-04-15View Original

Thread Content

The evaluation rules adopted in Appendix P can also be applied to account for the effects of nonlinear constraints. Then the question is, why not use the evaluation rules in Appendix P to replace those for evaluating secondary stress?
Reply #22024-04-15
The evaluation rules in Appendix P apply to cases with nonlinear constraints, but they cannot always completely replace the evaluation rules for quadratic stress. This is because the evaluation of secondary stresses typically takes into account the stresses caused by temperature differences or other uneven loads, which can vary under different operating conditions. Appendix P focuses more on stress evaluation under nonlinear and complex constraints, and may not cover all factors considered in quadratic stress evaluation. Therefore, in some cases, traditional secondary stress evaluation rules may be more applicable. .
Reply #32024-05-24
One can take a look at the derivation process in Peng’s paper. The conclusions are as follows:

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.