Does a liquid that poses an extreme hazard and does not reach the standard boiling point qualify as a pressure vessel?
Thread Content
Operating pressure: 0.4; required design pressure: 1.0. Operating temperature: 40 degrees; designed temperature: 50 degrees. The boiling point of the highly hazardous liquid is 80 degrees. Volume: 1 cubic unit. Does it fall into this category? I said it’s not in the class, but the chief installer keeps asking.
This post was last edited by kareale88 on 2018-11-29 at 12:50. What is the filling coefficient, and are there any other process conditions as well? Could you share the equipment structure and technical parameters so that everyone can discuss it?
No supervision is required, but it must be manufactured at 150.
Similar to this, one of them
With a loading factor of 0.8, 20% of this container exceeding 0.03 cubic units should also fall under the regulations regarding capacity.
I agree with what was said above: it is necessary to consider whether the volume of the gas phase space is 30L or more. In your case, compliance with relevant regulatory requirements is required, and the system must be designed, manufactured, inspected, and tested in accordance with standards for highly hazardous environments.
I agree with what was said on floor 5: it is necessary to consider whether the volume of the gas phase space is greater than or equal to 30 L. In your case, compliance with relevant regulatory requirements is required, and the system must be designed, manufactured, inspected, and tested in accordance with standards for highly hazardous environments.
There is a filling coefficient; then why is there also an overflow port at the top of the head? This overflow port is placed way too high
It should fall under the jurisdiction of pressure vessel regulations; the 5th floor said it is correct, and if it is completely filled, then it is no longer subject to the regulations for fixed pressure vessels
Designed, manufactured, and inspected for extreme hazard.