HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Can the side flange be raised just like a long-neck butt-weld flange?

2019-02-20View Original

Thread Content

As stated in the title, it is a floating-head heat exchanger; the wall thickness of the shell side cylinder is 6 mm, the diameter is 700, and 700-1.0 side flanges are used. However, the minimum butt weld wall thickness for side flanges of this specification is 8 mm, and standard GB/T29465 does not provide any methods or instructions for using enlarged flanges to butt weld thinner cylinders. However, adding spliced thick cylinders increases costs. Is there a better solution to this problem?
Reply #22019-02-21
Treat it as a non-standard flange; as long as the calculations are correct, that’s sufficient~
Reply #32019-02-21
Thickening the heat exchanger shell by 2 mm at this diameter doesn’t increase its weight much, yet it improves safety.
Reply #42019-02-22
Fierce competition, and the boss is cheap: L
Reply #52019-02-22
Designers have the right to take both safety and cost into comprehensive consideration
Reply #62019-02-22
I suggest you take a look at item D2.1 on page 288 and items 6.5.1/3 on page 323 of GB150

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.