TSG 07-2019 "Special Equipment Production and Filling Unit Licensing Rules" special post for complaints
Thread Content
May 22, 2019, China* * The State Administration for Market Regulation issued an announcement on the issuance of the "Licensing Rules for Special Equipment Production and Filling Units". The main content of the announcement is to announce that TSG 07-2019 "Licensing Rules for Special Equipment Production and Filling Units" will be implemented on June 1, 2019. The following regulations and standards will be abolished with the implementation of TSG 07-2019:: (1) "Boiler and Pressure Vessel Manufacturing License Conditions" (National Quality Inspection Boiler [2003] No. 194) ； (2) "Manufacturing Licensing Rules for Mechanical and Electrical Special Equipment (Trial)" (National Quality Inspection Pot [2003] No. 174) ； (3) "Licensing Rules for the Installation, Renovation and Maintenance of Mechanical and Electrical Special Equipment (Trial)" (National Quality Inspection Pot [2003] No. 251) ； (4)TSG G3001-2004 "Supervision and Management Rules for Boiler Installation and Renovation Units" ； (5)TSG R3001-2006 "Licensing Rules for Pressure Vessel Installation, Modification and Maintenance" ； (6)TSG R4001-2006 "Gas Cylinder Filling Permit Rules" ； (7)TSG D2001-2006 "Manufacturing Licensing Rules for Pressure Pipe Components" ； (8)TSG Z0004-2007 "Basic Requirements for Quality Assurance System for Special Equipment Manufacturing, Installation, Modification and Maintenance" ； (9)TSG Z0005-2007 "Special Equipment Manufacturing, Installation, Modification and Maintenance License Appraisal and Review Rules" ； (10)TSG R1001-2008 "Pressure Vessel and Pressure Piping Design Permit Rules" ； (11)TSG D3001-2009 "Pressure Pipeline Installation Permit Rules" ； (12)TSG R4002-2011 "Mobile Pressure Vessel Filling Permit Rules". (13) The relevant licensing procedures, conditions and requirements in TSG ZF001-2006 "Safety Technical Supervision Regulations for Safety Valves" and TSG ZF003-2011 "Safety Technical Supervision Regulations for Bursting Disk Devices". --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The workload of such a large-scale replacement of regulatory standards must be huge. Of course, we must give recognition to the work of the behind-the-scenes workers, but there will inevitably be unsatisfactory aspects in the writing. I will post it here for everyone to complain about. I would like to vomit here first: 1. P28, Note C-2 in the article mentions that “... at least one of the four sets of trial design documents provided is a third-category pressure vessel. ； ...", looking at the entire regulations, there is only one mention of Class III pressure vessels. Is this the reference to the 99 version of the regulations? We are still applying outdated regulations. 2. On P30 in the article, starting from Table C-2, there are A1, A2...C1, C2...D, without any explanation or introduction, and it was not noted in the special conditions until P35. Is this a flashback technique you learned?
The notice of the China Special Inspection Agency will be carried out in Tai'an, Shandong from July 1 to 5, 2019!
I don’t understand a lot, is there any explanation?
If you piece it all together, there will always be some problems. . .
The design qualifications of small pressure vessel design units or general manufacturers may have to be washed away.
This is the rhythm to kill a group of small pressure vessel factories!
This is the rhythm to kill a group of small pressure vessel factories!
Yes, small pressure vessels are expected to be phased out
Why do you say that? Which requirement indicates that the design qualifications of general manufacturers need to be cleared?
The design number is changed to 10 people. Generally, small pressure vessel factories have 5 people. They can only design products manufactured by themselves.
The second half of the last line on page 30 reads, "The total number of full-time design personnel is generally not less than 5, including not less than 2 approval personnel", which is unchanged from the original. C1.2.2 on page 27 says "the total number of full-time design personnel is generally not less than 10, of which there are not less than 2 approval personnel." It should be for full-time design institutes, right? !