Thread Content
Equipment management is both important and easily overlooked for many enterprises with a high volume of equipment assets. The importance of equipment management lies in the fact that it serves as the foundation and backbone for all outcomes related to production, quality, safety, and more ； It is easy to be overlooked, as improvements in equipment management often do not yield immediate results, unlike changes in indicators such as production, quality, and cost. Drawing on over a decade of experience in equipment management consulting, the author has identified four key elements that are essential for effective equipment management. The aim is to help equipment managers clarify their thinking, focus on the most important aspects, and quickly find ways to make progress in their work. I. Why is preventive maintenance particularly important? The development of equipment management has always progressed in line with the requirements of enterprise production management and quality control, while it also continuously seeks to define its own value and role. In this ongoing process of evolution, equipment management also continues to draw on the best practices from the fields of production management and quality management, gradually developing its own systems and operational mechanisms. We know that, from the most fundamental management perspectives, what businesses strive for is to maximize the output resulting from equipment investment, in other words, to maximize the efficiency of equipment utilization and operation. From this perspective, it is not difficult to understand the driving force behind the evolution of equipment management from \"reactive maintenance\" to \"preventive maintenance\". Only by properly addressing the disruption caused by sudden equipment failures to production plans and their negative impact on product quality can we even consider the issue of maximizing efficiency. Therefore, how to effectively \"prevent\" the occurrence of serious failures becomes an issue that all equipment managers must first consider and address. The implementation mechanisms for the preventive maintenance concept include a relatively mandatory execution of preventive maintenance plans (planned preventive maintenance system), as well as a preventive maintenance system based on inspections. The combination of the two is what many companies are familiar with today as the \"inspection-and-maintenance system\". Although the \"inspection and maintenance system\" is well-known to many companies, numerous problems still exist in its actual implementation. Including the issue of preventive maintenance plans not being able to be implemented effectively due to production schedules ； The issue of how to make the time cycles and maintenance tasks of preventive maintenance plans more reasonable ； The responsibility, awareness, and capabilities of the inspection personnel impact the effectiveness of detecting equipment degradation ； The completeness of elements in inspection standards, as well as the identification and assessment of inspection items ； Simple scheduled maintenance is unable to effectively prevent failures in complex equipment, and so on. It is to address these issues that, starting from the 1970s, efforts have been made to introduce new fault detection techniques and inspection methods in order to effectively monitor the trends and patterns of equipment degradation. Of course, although in the early days, due to technical limitations, it was not always possible to effectively monitor the trend of equipment degradation, efforts have been made to shift from time-based preventive maintenance to condition-based predictive maintenance (condition monitoring), and the technical methods for effective fault prevention and prediction are continuously being developed and improved. II. Do all equipment items require preventive maintenance? People continually deepen their understanding of the essence of things through practice. While equipment managers pursue \"preventive maintenance\" by continuously increasing investment in repairs—such as the labor costs associated with regular planned preventive maintenance activities and the costs of spare parts that need to be kept on hand—they have also begun to consider whether preventive maintenance is necessary for all equipment. For many types of manufacturing enterprises, high maintenance costs and the capital required for spare parts often increase production costs, thereby reducing the competitiveness of their products. As a result, it is only natural that company management asks equipment managers to find ways to reduce these maintenance costs. Moreover, such requests are usually made with the condition that the efficiency of the equipment remains unchanged; this also constitutes another important aspect for measuring and evaluating the core value of equipment management in a company. How can one have both fish and bear paws? How can horses run fast and stay in good health while eating less grass? It has become an inescapable challenge for equipment managers, and we must find a solution to this dilemma. Since we need to focus on the balance between the \"losses caused by sudden equipment failures\" and the \"investments made to prevent such losses\", either extreme approach is not advisable. Since not all equipment requires preventive maintenance, and since businesses should seek a model that minimizes overall costs, this brings up the issue of applying appropriate maintenance strategies. In other words, it is necessary to classify based on the characteristics of equipment failures, and to employ different maintenance strategies in order to achieve optimal overall costs. “The effective application of \"maintenance strategies\" becomes the second key point to be addressed in order to improve equipment management. Of course, a maintenance strategy is not simply a decision between reactive maintenance and preventive maintenance; in fact, maintenance strategies are very diverse and varied. If \"corrective maintenance\" is carried out to address design flaws in the equipment, it means not sticking to the original design but taking bold steps to address the root causes of recurring faults ； Another example is how to effectively convey the reasons for a device’s problems to the designers, or for similar machines, in order to address issues through analogous troubleshooting methods (similar to a car manufacturer’s recall system) and achieve \"preventive maintenance\" and so on. The coexistence and integrated application of these multi-mode maintenance strategies provide equipment managers with a wide range of effective means to achieve optimal overall costs. III. Integrating engineering and life-cycle concepts: After equipment management entered the \"production and maintenance\" phase in the 1960s, none of the activities and technical applications based on its key management aspects have seen any fundamental breakthroughs in terms of scope or management philosophy. What truly drives continuous progress in equipment management is the integrated engineering approach from the UK, which advocates life-cycle management. This approach shifts the focus of equipment management from merely focusing on its use and maintenance to covering the entire process, from planning to disposal of the equipment. This has greatly enhanced companies’ understanding of the scope of equipment management, particularly with regard to how to strengthen early-stage management in order to achieve minimal overall costs over the life cycle of the equipment. Integrated Equipment Engineering was proposed by the Britishman Dennis Buckus. The scope of work in equipment systems engineering includes the planning and design of equipment and structures, as well as their reliability and maintainability. It also covers various aspects such as the installation, commissioning, maintenance, modification, and upgrading of equipment. One of the key points of systems engineering is to seek the most economical cost over the equipment’s life cycle. Many studies indicate that the total cost of a device throughout its entire life cycle is determined at the time it leaves the factory. In other words, the price of the equipment determines the setup cost, while its reliability determines the maintenance cost. A device with good mechanical properties, reliability, and maintainability not only maintains high work efficiency but also reduces the costs associated with maintenance, upkeep, and energy consumption during use. Therefore, the decisions made at the beginning of equipment use have a significant impact on the economic efficiency over the entire life cycle, and should be given due attention. Integrated equipment engineering is a systematic approach to equipment management that incorporates the theories and research findings of systems engineering. It is also a management philosophy that considers equipment maintenance and management issues from the perspective of overall system optimization. In other words, the equipment system should be viewed from the perspective of systems engineering; by considering the entire lifecycle of the equipment, technical, economic, and organizational aspects can be planned and optimized as a whole to achieve the best results in terms of low costs and high efficiency. By thoroughly understanding the essence of comprehensive equipment engineering and establishing a systematic approach to equipment life-cycle management in practice, it becomes possible to consider the advantages and disadvantages of equipment management and maintenance from an overall perspective rather than focusing on just a particular stage or area. Therefore, “lifecycle management of equipment” is the third key to effective equipment management. IV. The Importance of Full Participation in Equipment Management Japan has long adopted equipment management practices based on those of the United States. In the early 1970s, after incorporating the principles outlined in Ansteel’s charter in China – such as ensuring that each piece of equipment is under someone’s supervision and that everyone has a specific responsibility – which emphasized the involvement of workers, a people-oriented approach, and the promotion of rationalization suggestions and work competitions – Japan recognized the importance of full participation in the implementation of PM. In other words, it is not only equipment specialists who need to consider equipment management and maintenance strategies; it is also necessary to acknowledge the important role that operators play in this area. The impact of operators on equipment management includes both positive and negative aspects. On the positive side, they can take advantage of their daily contact with the equipment to gain an understanding of its conditions, which enables them to identify early signs of equipment failures and address them before they escalate ； To eliminate negative impacts, it is necessary to regulate their behavior in order to effectively reduce repetitive human errors, prevent the deterioration caused by such errors, and slow down the occurrence of equipment failures. This concept of full participation in equipment management has significantly transformed the composition of the equipment management team, aiming for the active contribution of both operators and maintenance staff in order to maximize the overall efficiency of the equipment. From a practical perspective, involving all staff in equipment maintenance is an effective, low-cost, and straightforward approach to equipment management and maintenance. It not only helps to identify and eliminate equipment failures at an early stage but also frees maintenance personnel from the vicious cycle of dealing with numerous, frequent, low-quality, and reactive on-site failures. This gives them time and energy to focus on more fundamental aspects of equipment management and maintenance, to better understand the patterns behind equipment failures and the means to control them, as well as to carry out more effective preventive maintenance. For some time now, there has been a strange phenomenon in the field of equipment management in China: it is believed that TnPM/TPM and equipment management are not the same thing, and that TnPM/TPM represents activities that are separate from conventional equipment management. This is very strange: “Equipment management” without taking into account the involvement of all employees is still considered “equipment management,” whereas “equipment management” that does take such involvement into account (TnPM/TPM) is no longer considered “equipment management”! This is a wrong notion and misconception; “full participation” is the fourth and most important key to carrying out effective equipment management. Grasping the four key aspects of effective equipment management actually also helps us understand what the concepts and models of \"modern equipment management\" or \"advanced equipment management\" entail. Some technologically-oriented individuals believe that equipping oneself with advanced equipment inspection and condition monitoring tools, as well as robust information-based software for equipment management, is what constitutes \"modernity\" and \"advancedness\"; in doing so, they actually overlook the important role of management philosophy. Improvements in hardware can solve certain problems and serve as an important foundation for implementing effective \"soft management concepts.\" However, without advancements and guidance in management philosophy, investments in hardware will not only fail to achieve the desired results but will also lead to significant waste. The two complement each other; only when equipment managers in enterprises first embrace modern concepts of equipment management and then continuously consider how to apply technical methods to put these concepts into practice can the enterprise’s equipment management be brought onto a long-term, effective track.