HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Regarding the selection of weld evaluation methods

2018-06-17View Original

Thread Content

The manhole flange is of the SO type; for the part where the diameter increases and the area where it is welded to the short section, which welding procedure qualification should be used? If a butt weld procedure qualification is chosen, are there any thickness requirements for that? Can an angle weld procedure qualification be used instead?
Reply #22018-06-18
Is it necessary to use a 38-thickness plate for covering?
Reply #32018-06-20
Butt welding evaluation is selected; no thickness requirement is applicable
Reply #42018-06-25
Using butt evaluation will suffice, but it depends on whether there is a groove on the back side of your SO flange; if so, you still need to consider the thickness coverage range for the evaluation.
Reply #52018-06-26
If it is in accordance with national standards, there is usually a bevel on the back side of the flange; butt welding is used for evaluation, with the thicknesses of both the pipe fitting and the flange being taken into account

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.