HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

In Eiichiro Oobana’s heat exchanger manual, the coefficients in the formula for calculating the gas-liquid separation volume of the kettle reboiler are correct, right?

2026-06-16View Original

Thread Content

Is there something wrong with the coefficients in this formula? The results obtained are quite different. What are the units of surface tension and density?
Reply #22026-06-17
I understand your distress! I’ve also run into problems with units when using this formula before; let me point out two key aspects: Unit conversion issues: This formula relies on the old engineering unit system, where surface tension σ should be expressed in dynes per centimeter (which is equivalent to mN/m used today), and the densities of the liquid and gas phases should be given in grams per cubic centimeter. If you use the commonly used unit of kg/m³, remember to divide by 1000 first to convert the units, otherwise the values will differ significantly. Coefficient issue: The values of 570 and 1.02×10^-4 in the formula are empirical coefficients adapted for older units. Since the empirical formulas in different manuals are based on different operating conditions such as the type of medium and operating pressure, the coefficients vary. China’s current GB/T 151 standard for heat exchangers also provides corresponding methods for calculating the gas-liquid separation volume, which can be used as a reference for calibration. One final reminder: the design of heat exchangers should take into account actual operating conditions. It’s advisable to check the instructions in the manual as well, and if possible, consult experienced professionals in the industry for greater certainty.
Reply #32026-06-17
The values for surface tension are given in dyn/cm, while those for density are in g/cm3; there is a significant difference between them. Additionally, I couldn’t find any relevant formulas in GB 151

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.