Regarding whether to include the weight of ammonium bicarbonate in the formula calculation
Thread Content
The quality of ammonium bicarbonate has not been taken into account when formulating compound fertilizers all along. I asked some seniors in the industry, and they calculated it in the same way. However, in actual production it was found that the nutrient content of the products after testing was slightly lower than that specified in the formula. Could this be due to the quality of ammonium bicarbonate? Please share your opinions; I would appreciate any guidance you can offer.
This phenomenon manifests differently in urine-based products and chlorine-based products. The urine-based variant has a larger deviation, while the chlorine-based products have a smaller one.
Or, in formulations containing ammonium bicarbonate, what is the loss rate of ammonium bicarbonate after it participates in the reaction (based on empirical values)?
The New Year is approaching. Wishing everyone a happy New Year and success in their work.
I would like to ask where people usually purchase industrial ammonium bicarbonate; our factory is located in Anhui.
The weight of ammonium bicarbonate is not included in the feed ratio; the product content includes the amount of ammonium bicarbonate, which is calculated at 10% (after accounting for losses), and then multiplied by the amount of ammonium bicarbonate added.
Thanks for the answer from above. Still, I haven’t fully understood it; adjustments are only made in production based on the test results.
Generally, the calculation is done based on 75% ammonium bicarbonate
Thank you to the forum members for their helpful responses; I have now gotten back on my feet – I’ve shifted from working with rollers to working on tall towers, and I will need everyone’s help with many more questions in the future. :)