Thread Content
I have a project that involves hydrogen hazards. The company’s management said that decisions regarding layout and fire safety distances are made through collective decision-making, but it is the designer who signs off on the design. In the event of problems, is responsibility shared among the team or falls on the designer alone? ? ?
Should the things that need to be designed be decided collectively? . . . . This character seal is not acceptable
No, we are all involved in sewage treatment; we are not experts in handling hazardous materials. Therefore, decisions are made collectively, but the signature must come from the person who designed it. It’s not that everything that needs to be designed must first be decided upon collectively before the designer signs off
Personally, I believe that professional documents such as drawings should be signed by the designer and reviewed by the technical supervisor. Decisions regarding a project must be signed by the top leader before it can be implemented.
Whoever signs is responsible. If it’s not done professionally, it should be outsourced to a professional subcontractor; the design should be carried out by a design institute. Even if you sign, construction will still be illegal if there is no official stamp indicating qualified competence. Decisions should be made collectively – do you have any evidence of such collective decision-making?
Are there any requirements for qualifications such as a certified control engineer to implement planar PID control? We are Class B in environmental design
Even if there are meeting minutes, it still counts as negligence on your part
Does PID require qualifications for pressure pipelines and permits for urban and rural planning?
Are there any specific qualifications required for preparing explosion-proof and fire-resistant layout plans or floor plans?