Thread Content
This post was last edited by yuchenchf on 2017-3-16 at 15:29. The application of differential pressure transmitters in oil depot metering: In current designs for measuring the liquid level in oil depot tanks, radar level gauges, or float, buoy, and steel-band type level gauges are commonly used. Although radar level gauges offer high precision, they are also expensive, while level gauges such as floats and balls are more troublesome to install and maintain. Differential pressure level gauges are widely used in sealed containers such as boiler drums, but their measurement results do not represent the actual liquid level; therefore, they are rarely used in the design of oil tank level measurement systems. In fact, the exact liquid level in oil storage tanks is not that important; what users really need to know is not the level itself, but rather the actual amount of oil in the tank – in terms of tons – so as to prevent overfilling. Based on this analysis, using the differential pressure method to measure liquid level (actually in terms of tons) is also a good option. Since the use of differential pressure transmitters is now highly mature, transmitters such as 1151, 3051, and EJA have highly advanced technology, with accuracy reaching up to 0.075 grade; moreover, their prices have dropped significantly, offering a good performance-to-price ratio. Design principle As the name implies, a differential pressure level gauge measures the pressure difference, that is, △P=ρg△h. Since oil tanks are usually cylindrical, the area S of their circular cross-section remains constant. Therefore, weight G = △P × S²; and since S = ρg△h / S², with S being constant, G is directly proportional to △P. In other words, as long as the △P value is accurately detected, the actual inventory level G of the oil can be determined. The formula also shows that its density ρ is inversely proportional to the height △h; although the volume of the oil expands or contracts with changes in temperature, causing the actual liquid level to rise or fall, the pressure detected remains constant. If the user needs to display the actual liquid level, medium temperature compensation can also be introduced to address this issue. Practical Application In the Wenzhou New Century Oil Depot project, the author applied this approach to the actual design. Design conditions: 2000 m3 oil tank, diameter d=14.5 m, height h=14 m. Primary gauge: A flanged flameproof differential pressure transmitter is used; the flanged design is intended to prevent dirt at the bottom of the tank from accumulating and blocking the pressure transfer tubes. The transmitter’s range is 0–140 kPa. Secondary display: The WP series intelligent light-column alarm indicator is used, featuring universal signal input that allows for arbitrary range adjustment; the liquid level is displayed via light columns, while the amount of oil in tons is shown numerically. Taking Tank No. 6 as an example, S=π×r2=3.14×7.252=165 m2, with a height of 14 m. At the top of the oil tank, a level alarm system is designed to prevent the oil from overflowing, serving as an extra safety measure. In the application, since the measurement value is given directly in tons, regardless of the type of oil stored in the tank, the value displayed on the secondary meter represents the tons of oil present in the tank, eliminating the need to determine the density for conversion. Generally, the transfer of oil products in and out of storage is carried out using pumps, with flow measurement being done via elliptical gear flow meters. Due to the limited accuracy of these flow meters, which is at most 0.2 grade, it is also necessary to measure the density; as a result, there can be some discrepancies, leading to measurement-related disputes. Now, since the measurement results for oil tanks are given in tons, with an accuracy level of up to 0.2 or even 0.1, the measurement results are more accurate compared to volume flow meters. Although when a small quantity of oil is stored or taken out, the absolute error in the measurement is relatively large due to resolution limitations, when a large volume of oil is handled, its high precision and low relative error are unmatched by other measurement methods, making it particularly suitable for monthly, quarterly, and annual inventory checks. Practice has shown that its main advantages are: ① Simple and convenient installation and maintenance ; ②The readings are intuitive, direct, and clear, allowing for an immediate determination of the oil inventory level ; ③The determination and conversion of density are eliminated. Points to note: (1) During design and installation, consideration should be given to placing the pressure tapping holes at the bottom of the oil tank as low as possible, in order to eliminate errors caused by temperature changes; temperature compensation should be employed if necessary. (2) When the horizontal cross-section of the oil tank is not uniform (e.g., smaller at the top and larger at the bottom), compensation measures need to be considered. For secondary meters, the WP-H80 series level-volume controller is selected. (3) To achieve a certain level of accuracy, if a breather valve is installed on the top of the oil tank, a differential pressure transmitter must be used instead of a pressure transmitter. For open-top oil tanks or situations where high precision is not required, a pressure transmitter can be used directly to facilitate installation. (4) Where possible, use smart meters for secondary instruments, as they facilitate range adjustments and enable temperature compensation, among other functions. (5) During installation, a water collector should be installed in the negative pressure chamber of the differential pressure transmitter, and waste water should be drained regularly to prevent accumulated water from affecting accuracy. Everyone, please continue to add explanations for the incorrect or incomplete parts, so that those who read it next will learn more. What you know is exactly what everyone needs.
Theoretically, there is no problem; from a metrological perspective, it is not precise enough. One is that the storage tank needs to be calibrated for measurement; second, if the tank deforms, the measurements will be inaccurate, as the same volume of medium will result in different masses; third, if the density of the medium is not up to date, the corrections made will also be inaccurate