Thread Content
What are the differences between these two types of explosion-proof flexible hoses? 1. Are their models the same? 2. Can they be used interchangeably?
The manufacturer can produce it in any specification required.
This pipe serves no real purpose other than to deliver water; these days we use explosion-proof sealed connectors, so there’s no need for this flexible hose at all
When using a flexible hose alone, water in the conduit can flow into the instruments; it is better to use the flexible hose in combination with a Y-type sealing joint, filling the sealing joint with sealant or putty. This not only protects the cables but also prevents water from entering.
Many organizations no longer use flexible conduits nowadays; they are inconvenient to maintain, not waterproof, and water seeps in regardless of what is done. After all, they are used alongside wiring conduits as well, and their installation is quite troublesome. The use of flexible conduits reflects an outdated approach
Well, these days many systems use armored cables that go directly into the meters; it’s sufficient to ensure that the connections to the meters are properly sealed.
There’s a bunch of idiots upstairs; flexible hoses cannot be used on their own – they need explosion-proof connectors. It’s still leaking, still based on old concepts~~~·~~I’m speechless!
Seeing someone of your low quality, I’ll be vulgar once too—go to hell! ! !