Depth of thermometer insertion

Insert at 30% of the radius. No explanation. . . If you believe, it will work; if not, go fuck yourself..... :P .

SHT 3005-2016 Specification for the Selection and Design of Automation Instruments in the Petrochemical Industry 5.3.11 The selection of temperature probe sleeves shall comply with the following requirements: e) The insertion depth of the temperature probe sleeve shall ensure that the end of the temperature sensing element is located in the region where temperature changes of the medium being measured are most significant. When installing inside a pipe, the insertion depth should be between 1/3 and 1/2 of the pipe’s diameter, with at least 50 mm inserted into the pipe ； When installing inside a container, the insertion depth should be at least 150 mm from the inner wall of the container; however, for containers equipped with agitators, this depth can be appropriately reduced ； 1. At the 1/2 diameter point of the pipe, based on the velocity distribution of the fluid within the pipe, the flow velocity is highest at this location; hence it best represents the real-time temperature of the fluid, while also being least affected by the external temperature of the pipe. However, the impact force on the casing is also greater, so shear force and casing frequency calculations need to be taken into account. So, combine 1/3 to 1/2. 2. The design institute will specify the insertion depth of the sleeve in the specifications; it is necessary to take into account the height of the mounting boss, and verify whether the insertion depth – sleeve length minus boss height – meets the required standards.

"At a pipe diameter of 1/2, based on the velocity distribution of the fluid within the pipe, the flow velocity is highest at this point, making it the most suitable location to represent the real-time temperature of the fluid. Nonsense. Evaluation completed...

““At the pipe diameter of 1/2” – by “pipe center”, do you mean right in the middle? Adding extra words makes it complicated and wordy; what a pain...... Even speaking is fucking unattractive and not sexy at all :lol The flow rate is highest at the pipe center, which is also the point where the temperature reaches its peak. However, the peak value does not reflect the usual temperature nor the average temperature; it cannot represent the normal temperature level. So, inserting the thermometer at the \"1/2 pipe diameter\" point was a complete mistake on his part – a serious, huge error. {:2_36:} Idiot ............ .

Talking to the mentally ill lowers the standard. But I have to say it: TMD, can’t you just express your nonsense properly?!

Hehe, trying to reason with idiots is like playing music for donkeys – it’s always difficult. You’re supposed to create standards and guidelines for such a large country with over a billion people. There are round pipes, square pipes, rectangular pipes, and flat pipes as well. When you use expressions like “pipe diameter of 1/2”, they’re confusing, nonsensical, and fail to convey the intended meaning. How can such crappy standards be universal? How can production be guided comprehensively? Idiot ..........Donkey-headed fool, a low-quality donkey among donkeys...... {:2_42:} .

The standard range is 1/3 to 1/2; if the pipe diameter is less than 100, an expansion pipe needs to be installed: lol