Regarding cable shielding selection
Thread Content
According to chemical industry standards, it is recommended that for the shielding of instrument signal cables, a combination of a main shield and individual shields be used. Generally, we use computer cables for instrument signal cables; multi-core computer cables require a main shield along with individual shields, while two-core or three-core computer cables benefit from individual shields. I would like to ask whether there are any issues with this approach What’s the impact of a few hundred meters distance?
Do two-core or three-core versions have a main screen and sub- screens?
Do you mean something like 1*2*1.0? With this type, there is no option for a full-screen view along with a split-screen view; whether you choose the full-screen or split-screen mode, it’s the same – there is only one layer of display.
It’s just written as *inertia*; if you take a close look at the samples, you’ll see that cables with only two or three conductors don’t have a PVP model – they either have PV or VP, and these mean the same thing.
Yes, the three-core cables we use are for total division of the screen, and the price is quite reasonable. I haven’t seen a main screen for those with two cores
In fact, multi-core cables used for analog signals require a main screen along with sub-creens, while multi-core cables used for digital and switch signals can do without sub-creens.
This post was last edited by GeniusTTUV on 2022-1-17 at 14:07.