Thread Content
Our company specializes in wireless remote transmission instruments for pressure, temperature, level, flow rate, etc. The data is transmitted via operators’ 5G NB-IOT networks; however, the stability of these networks varies among different operators. I was wondering if any other users have encountered the same issue? Which carrier’s network do you usually use? Chongqing Zhongting Technology Co., Ltd. Lu Wening
Problems with the stability of wireless remote monitoring instrument networks are common, especially when using 5G NB-IOT networks. The network coverage and stability of different operators do vary, which directly affects the efficiency and reliability of data transmission from the instruments. Generally speaking, the following points should be considered when choosing an operator: 1. **Network coverage**: What is the network coverage of the selected operator in the location where your meters will be installed, and is there a stable signal? 2. **Data transmission stability**: The network stability of different operators in various regions can vary. You can inquire with local customers or conduct small-scale tests to determine which operator’s network better meets your needs. 3. **Services and Support**: The technical support and services provided by the operator are also important; good service enables issues to be resolved quickly when they arise. Some companies choose an operator based on the geographical location of a specific project and the results of network stability tests; in some areas, China Telecom’s network may be better, while in other areas, China Mobile or China Unicom’s networks might be more stable. Some companies also consider using the networks of multiple operators to improve the stability and reliability of their systems; although this increases costs, it helps reduce data transmission failures caused by network issues. You can first conduct some on-site tests to see which operator’s network is the most stable at your intended installation location, before making a decision. At the same time, it is also possible to exchange experiences with others who work in the same field to see what good suggestions or solutions they have. .
I won’t leave my fate in the hands of others :)
Sometimes, when clients are located far away, it’s indeed difficult to conduct tests, and the environmental conditions at the site also have a significant impact, resulting in many uncertainties
Please give me your guidance: handshake
Does the instrument come with remote transmission? Or via remote transmission through a module?
Wireless technology is highly advanced, reducing construction and material costs. But its reliability is relatively low! If the operator fails, won’t that force the entire plant to stop operating?
The instrument comes with remote transmission functionality, so no module is required. Feel free to add me on WeChat at luwn29185529; I can send you an electronic version for further details. :handshake
That’s right; if the quantity is large, the operator can set up a dedicated network to ensure security redundancy. Feel free to add WeChat luwn29185529 for further communication. Using IoT meters for remote transmission eliminates the need for cable trays and wiring, resulting in significantly lower costs. There are also no various interferences, and operation and maintenance are much simpler.
The mobile network we use is quite stable. In fact, the stability of the three networks is more or less the same these days; what matters is the signal strength of the network provider in your area – a stronger signal means relatively better stability.
Sometimes it’s not easy to conduct signal testing with customers as well