“Is the statement \"We have to consider the company\" necessarily correct?
Thread Content
Why discuss this sentence? In my opinion, the company is currently facing some issues with equipment management. For example: the workshop has assigned personnel in charge of equipment technology management, and some of these people cannot or do not want to draw diagrams; in other words, they are not capable of doing so or lack the necessary expertise. In such situations, the functional management departments often assign staff from other workshops to carry out this task. As a result, those staff have to work extra hours, encounter unforeseen issues, and are held accountable if mistakes occur; whereas those who don’t do the work are not held responsible even if there are mistakes. The reality now is that although training opportunities are provided, no one wants to learn. I don’t think so; you can tell him who can do it and let him figure out a way to solve it on his own. If he tries once, twice, or three times and still can’t do it, then he’s not qualified for this position. Otherwise, the job requirements should not stipulate such a capability. Everyone, do you think my idea is correct? How can this situation be resolved?
It seems to be the same in every case: as soon as there’s work to be done, people start pushing to get it done, and as a result those who do it inevitably make mistakes and end up having their pay reduced; while if they don’t do it, there are no mistakes, and they still get a high salary. Strange phenomenon. Those who are not competent for the position don’t have the authority to make any moves either, unless you’re a senior executive. :lol
This is the practice of shifting responsibility, passing it off to others. The functional management department cannot assign tasks to staff from other workshops; any assignments are made to the equipment management personnel, who then coordinate with the workshop staff to complete the work. If the equipment management personnel are unable to coordinate, they can seek assistance from their superiors. But responsibilities must be taken on, and the division of labor must be clear. Although it may not be done professionally, strict control and thorough oversight are necessary. And you can ask for help once, or twice; keep doing that three or four times, yet still not make an effort to learn on your own* – then you’re not competent enough; replace you with those who are capable!
This is very common – those who are more capable work harder, yet get no recognition for it
I also hate those who say 【I can’t do it】. My approach is: it’s fine if you can’t do it; go somewhere else or learn from someone else*. You don’t need to go to work – just attend training, and your salary will be based on the training fee.
How dare you keep the position when you’re not qualified for it? Your face isn’t red at all; hurry up and switch someone
I can only watch; I can’t move them.
I think functional departments need to be like this in order to gain respect and to facilitate professional progress
It’s a good idea. I plan to give it a try in this workshop; it’s necessary to create a work environment that encourages everyone to be proactive.
How could such a person know what blushing is? It’s impossible to give up the seat.
How could such a person know what blushing is? It’s impossible to give up the seat.