Some devices are designed according to old standards, and it is impossible to modify them to meet the new standards after those standards have been updated. So, it has always been the principle of “old devices use old methods, new devices use new methods”...
Thread Content
Some devices are designed according to old standards, and it is impossible to modify them to meet the new standards after those standards have been updated. Therefore, the principle of \"old methods for old devices, new methods for new devices\" has always been followed. Is such an approach appropriate, or are there any legal provisions that permit it?
Senior, in my opinion, whether it’s corporate management or the management of manufacturing plants, under normal circumstances – that is, unless there are situations such as war or forces beyond human control – it is necessary to keep up with the times. Only in this way can we ensure survival of the fittest, enhance competitiveness, and improve processes, facilities, and production methods; only then can we make progress.
This is usually the approach, with two exceptions: first, when the regulations explicitly state until which year the old version remains in use; second, when various official directives require upgrades and renovations, otherwise the business will have to close
But it’s not that simple to just talk about it; some devices are very expensive, and it seems that in some aspects things can be done according to this approach
It seems that it’s possible to do this from a fire safety perspective