What are the advantages and disadvantages of various quench heat exchangers and quench towers?
Thread Content
What are the advantages and disadvantages of various quench heat exchangers and quench towers?
If you want to discuss it, you need to put some materials up first; anything missing can be added – there’s nothing at the moment. Asking someone to find information for you and discuss it with you is too much to ask
Gases resulting from reactions such as ethylene cracking, MTO, and FCC require rapid cooling. Cooling can be done through direct quenching or indirect quenching; direct quenching uses towers, while indirect quenching uses heat exchangers.
Gases resulting from reactions such as ethylene cracking, MTO, and FCC require rapid cooling. Cooling can be done through direct quenching or indirect quenching; direct quenching uses towers, while indirect quenching uses heat exchangers.
Gases resulting from reactions such as ethylene cracking, MTO, and FCC require rapid cooling. Cooling can be done through direct quenching or indirect quenching; direct quenching uses towers, while indirect quenching uses heat exchangers.
Discuss which cooling method is more reasonable? What is the device type? Wait
You haven’t even listed them, so how can people discuss them?
Direct mixing with water for contact quenching – I’m not familiar with the type of equipment used for this； Or a combination of a quench boiler and a quench tower.
Direct contact cooling involves phase change, has relatively low water consumption, but generates wastewater. The partition type is generally not designed to undergo phase changes; it has a high water consumption, and the heat exchanger requires careful design.
Heat exchangers need to be carefully designed. How exactly should they be designed? ? ?