HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

CNPC invests 11.6 billion yuan to resubmit the approval request for the Tongzhou Blue Sea high-end polyolefin new materials project

2025-02-20View Original

Thread Content

On February 17, the Tongzhou Bay River-Sea Integrated Development Demonstration Zone issued a notice announcing the first public disclosure of the environmental impact assessment for the high-end polyolefin new materials project of Blue Sea New Materials (Tongzhou Bay) Co., Ltd. (re-submitted for approval). Project Name: High-End Polyolefin New Materials Project of Blue Ocean New Materials (Tongzhou Bay) Co., Ltd. (Re-submission for approval) ; Project location: Within the Tongzhou Bay Coastal Green Chemical Industry Development Zone (main port), Jiangsu Province ; Project nature: New construction ; Total investment: 1,162,601 million yuan ; Project overview: 200,000 t/a FDPE plant, 50,000 t/a EPDM plant, 100,000 t/a POE plant, 100,000 t/a 1-hexene/1-octene plant, 2,000 Nm³/h electrolytic water hydrogen production plant, along with supporting utility systems and auxiliary facilities. According to the announcement, the environmental impact assessment report for Blue Sea New Materials (Tongzhou Bay) Co., Ltd.’s high-end polyolefin new materials project has received approval from the environmental authorities; however, due to significant changes during the design process, it is necessary to submit the application for approval again. Historical EIA information: On March 27, 2024, Sinopec Blue Sea New Materials published a public notice seeking opinions on the environmental impact assessment for its “High-End Polyolefin New Materials Project”. According to the disclosed environmental impact assessment report, the total investment and project overview for this renewed approval are essentially the same as those in the previous environmental impact assessment; the only difference lies in the wording, with “2*25,000 t/a EPDM production facility” being replaced by “50,000 t/a EPDM production facility”. Since the environmental impact assessment documents were not made public for this renewed approval, it is not possible to determine what specific “significant changes” have taken place during the design process.
Reply #22025-02-20
The scale has doubled, but all the figures such as the total investment remain unchanged – who are they trying to fool?

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.