Regarding the manufacturing process, does our design need to meet just one standard, or do we have to comply with all those numerous standards?
Thread Content
When it comes to manufacturing processes, even for issues within the same category, is it sufficient for our design to meet just one standard, or does it need to meet all the standards related to that issue? I’m puzzled – why are there so many redundant and overlapping standards? In the chemical industry, wouldn’t it be sufficient to have one standard for each specific issue?
It must be a child. **Mandatory norms must be satisfied. Then, each project will adopt certain industry standards; any industry standards specified in the submission as those to be followed will be treated as national standards within that project. For national standards, one direction can be adopted for implementation, with the other serving as a supplement. For example, 50160 and 50016. If you firmly adhere to 50160, then everything related to 50160 should be based on it; for aspects that are not covered by 50160, you can refer to other standards, such as 50016. It is not allowed to refer to several standards simultaneously and choose any standard that is favorable to oneself to follow.
Thank you!~~~~~~~~~~~
It was explained so well and clearly, thank you!
When there are contradictions in ASUS’s specifications, which set of specifications should be followed? For example, a **regulation is established and put into effect, but the norms it is based on are only updated every few years; how should it be implemented during this transition period?
Generally, there is a main standard; for matters not specified in that main standard, other relevant standards can be referred to. But I’m wondering: when two standards conflict with each other, does it suffice to follow just one of them? But it is certain that the standards for a project should be unified; one should not switch between them depending on which is more advantageous
For example, if your current project is in the field of fine chemicals, then use 50016 as the standard. Then, following 50016 is a certainty. For 50016, if no restrictions are specified, you can refer to 50160. Since 50016 is in conflict with 50160, 50016 should be followed. It is not allowed to choose whichever provision is favorable to oneself from 50016 and 50160.
So, when you see a project listed with so many specifications, are they all actually taken into consideration, or are they just listed there for show?
Everything that is posted must be strictly followed. Otherwise, for those with a T, or row labels, you shouldn’t attach them. Just like me, I use SH3011 and SH3012. If you don’t want to use it, then don’t hang up. Once it’s hung up, you need to follow the instructions.