Thread Content
Today I saw a member who claimed to be a newcomer yet had received over 20 best answer awards recently. Looking at his profile, I saw that he had a master’s degree. His replies to other members’ posts were indeed quite professional, filled with lots of data and images. It made me realize just how inadequate my own knowledge is...:dizzy: I’ve been working for almost 7 years now, having worked as an instrument technician, a technical reform specialist, an instrument supervisor, and now, due to my child, I’m back to working in instrument design, a field I’m not very familiar with. Considering my experience, it seems I should have more knowledge, but I still lack it, and my management skills aren’t particularly outstanding either...:L I’m truly ashamed...:$ So I’d like to ask everyone: what majors have you studied, what’s your highest educational attainment, how long have you been working, how many years have you spent in the field of control instruments, what positions have you held, and what are your plans for the future...:time: I’m just trying to start a discussion; I hope everyone will feel free to share their thoughts, talk about life things we haven’t discussed in ages, and talk about those ideals we’ve forgotten over time...{:1_90:}
The original poster is really impressive – having only worked for 7 years, they have already become a director. As long as the platform is good, one can jump high; keep it up!~~
Reaching the position of director in just seven years – the original poster is amazing! !
Tianze, I have some minor doubts recently regarding which forum section to post in. A post like the one by the original poster, if it were posted in the dashboard section, would definitely get a high number of replies, but it’s not quite appropriate there ; If it’s placed here, the number of replies cannot be guaranteed, nor can people express themselves freely. I don’t know how to make a choice? Should we move it over first? @yuchenchf @zxb1990 The original poster might be a bit provocative. Those who enter the industry may be newcomers, but their educational qualifications might not be genuine; they could also be lazy and haven’t gone to the trouble of correcting them, yet they certainly have a lot of work experience. It is assumed that graduates enter this group, so their educational qualifications are presumed to be relatively high.
There’s no need to worry about this; since the original poster chose to place it in the workplace context, it’s actually part of the workplace itself. It enables better discussions on workplace issues!
Boss, how about moving it over? I also hesitated for a while; I had originally thought of choosing the life section……
Tianze? Are you Tianze from the chemical instrumentation group? :handshake
It should be me; just ask him~
I share the same feelings as the original poster. After graduating from university, I started working at a chemical plant as a technician. Over the years, I have been involved in on-site maintenance, major renovations, and project expansions; I have worked both as a technician and as a manager. Over these more than ten years, I’ve found that there are increasingly more things I don’t understand, and there is so much knowledge I need to learn. The instrumentation industry is developing rapidly, and if you’re not careful, you can fall behind. When it comes to the educational background of those working in instrumentation, I believe it’s better to have a university degree, as it provides a certain theoretical foundation and facilitates quicker entry into the field. Of course, there are also people who haven’t attended university but are still very skilled in instrumentation work; I have several colleagues who started their careers as instrumentation technicians after graduating from high school, and now they are highly proficient in their skills – some hold managerial positions while others are deputy managers. So, the quality of work in this field depends on an individual’s insight. Those in technical fields who possess both intelligence and emotional intelligence can become leaders, while those who only have intelligence but lack emotional intelligence can only do their assigned tasks well.
Six years of work experience, ranging from instrument maintenance to maintenance management, then to equipment management and procurement management, and further to design management, as well as work as a bid evaluation expert – my responsibilities have kept evolving as needs changed. Then, due to personal reasons, I had to start over and enter a design institute; now I’m working hard at the lowest level.
This post was last edited by superme84 on 2015-6-12 08:16. Is the ‘Haiyou’ mentioned by the original poster some famous user named H? I had a similar experience to the original poster: I worked as a technician for 7 years before becoming a supervisor, but now I have moved to a design firm outside the traditional system, and I have many thoughts on this. To manage effectively, one must know how to act; it’s important to know when to take action and when to pretend not to see anything. People who are honest and kind but have a weaker personality are not suitable for management tasks.