Is adding charm by the moderators a useless feature?
Thread Content
This post was last edited by Thank goodness you're here on 2015-6-25 08:22. After checking the criteria used for judging moderators, I wonder whether adding charm to the scoring system in the management process is actually useful or not Most SeaFriends still value wealth, as it allows them to download materials, send flowers, and spend money; as for charm, it probably isn’t that important, unless they are lower-level players who are eager to upgrade. Regarding the evaluation of charm, it is required that 1 charm be equivalent to 10 wealth units; therefore, conversion is possible only when the score of the main post exceeds 10 wealth units. Otherwise, it constitutes arbitrary evaluation of charm. What are your thoughts on this? Can one really afford this? http://bbs.hcbbs.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1399158&page=1#pid13690154 Criteria for moderator scoring; standards for awarding points to moderators. For normal technical discussion posts, points should be awarded at a level corresponding to the lower end of the normal score range. (Wealth is generally given priority; if moderators assign a charm score, it can be calculated on a scale of 1=10, following the same criteria as for wealth.) It’s better to have less rather than poor quality! (1) “In-depth discussion”: Such responses provide a meaningful analysis of the topic, with the discussion length being over 50 characters. The maximum additional wealth award is ≤10. Those who provide particularly insightful responses of more than 200 words can receive an additional wealth award of ≤20. If multiple moderators or members award points, the scoring between them does not conflict. (2) “Active participation”: Such responses involve participatory discussion on the topic, but without any analytical explanation. Maximum additional wealth ≤5. (3) “Helping others solve problems”: Such responses are applicable to requests for assistance, and as long as the issue being asked about is not too difficult to address, an additional wealth of ≤10 can be given. (4) Ratings: Please note that those who deliberately give high ratings in a meaningless manner (5 times) will be penalized; in severe cases, their accounts may be banned. The moderation team holds the final decision-making authority. (5) “Encouraging new members to speak” is generally aimed at members in the second grade of elementary school or below; for replies or topics that show a certain level of participation in forum discussions, points ranging from +1 to +9 are awarded as wealth bonuses. (6) “Initiating a topic” generally involves participatory discussion on the subject, but without analytical explanations. For requests for help, it is generally not advisable to award bonus points; a bonus of up to 10 wealth points may be given at most. (7) Requests that use humiliating language, such as “kneeling and begging” or “begging while naked”, will be deleted. (8) For original technical topics or technical materials, a bonus of up to 50 wealth points can be given; this is usually decided by those in positions above district deputy moderators. (9) For original or highly insightful technical discussion posts, with the administrator’s approval, a reward of up to 100 wealth points can be given in one go.
It’s not really useless, but the feature for moderators to evaluate charm levels has been unavailable for a long time; it’s now back, yet the new moderators have not gone through that evaluation process before, so they feel unsure about how to use it. The current scoring criteria provide the simplest explanations; it will be fine once a habit of assessing charm is gradually developed.
While reading the posts now, I am indeed thinking of some excuses to see if I can rate them as attractive
Oh, so I’m the new moderator, huh~ Let’s take an example: for a post about resource sharing, can I give 20 Wealth + 3 Charm?
The easter egg of smashing watermelons – does that need an excuse? If you get hit, just say that you haven’t rated it yet and don’t know how to handle it. Or, after exchanging the wealth points, think that this post is really impressive and is worth that much in terms of wealth in my eyes!
No, the forum has rules: posts containing information do not earn points, or only earn fewer points, especially for moderators. Because there is a download share. Of course, many of the rules are in one’s mind – it’s not that they don’t exist, but it’s difficult to find the original text of just a casual notice or one from a long time ago. This compilation brings together most of the rules; a separate post can be created to continuously collect any missing rules or those that exist only in people’s minds, so as to supplement and refine these rules.
I just became a full-time employee yesterday; at first glance, I thought that wealth and charm go hand in hand. Wealth is change, while charm is currency. It’s similar to 1 yuan and 10 yuan in real life, you know. . . .
Indeed, charm is a separate score. When moderators assess charm, they can follow the same principle as when assessing prestige – that is, to give fewer evaluations but more thoughtful ones. The exchange for wealth is merely a rough criterion in the initial stage; I believe that aside from special events, there are very few cases where the moderator rating exceeds 10 wealth points, which generally aligns with the aforementioned principle.
It’s fine; they were arguing in their own group early in the morning! I brought it up just to ask; I’m also struggling with deciding how to give it. If I do give it, I’m afraid I’ll get in trouble ； I won’t give it; I think the post is pretty good. I was also nervous without seeing the easter egg of smashing the watermelon up there.
Fewer points for information posts? It seems like this is the first time I’ve heard of it~
Strictly speaking: bonus points are prohibited.