HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

The flaws in NB/T47014-2011

2015-06-26View Original

Thread Content

According to page 51 of the standard NB/T47014-2011, it is possible to manufacture pqr values of 25, thereby achieving full coverage. But this domestic standard has one flaw: 25mm should not be considered a standard thickness for steel plates. So why can’t steel plates with a thickness of 24mm or 26mm replace those with a thickness of 25mm? Is there really a significant difference in the weldability of 24mm and 26mm steel plates compared to 25mm steel plates? http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-1410181-1-1.html
Reply #22015-06-26
When preparing weld overlay test specimens, the thickness of the base layer is usually chosen to be the minimum value; in that case, 25 is practically useless. Because choosing a value less than 25 means the coverage area will be greater than the selected thickness; generally, efforts are made to choose a value as small as possible.
Reply #32015-06-27
When preparing weld overlay test specimens, when selecting the thickness of the base layer of the specimen, it is advisable to choose the minimum value possible

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.