HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

SW opening reinforcement calculation

2015-07-07View Original

Thread Content

I have a question: when using SW for hole reinforcement calculations, the equal-area reinforcement method fails to meet the requirements (resulting in -2%), while another reinforcement method passes the criteria (+2%). Is this considered a successful calculation?
Reply #22015-07-07
No problem, as long as any of the calculation methods works. Because any calculation method has a certain degree of conservatism...
Reply #32015-07-07
Sure. Teacher Qin Shujing from the central station has spoken about this issue. Regardless of the reinforcement method used, as long as it is applicable, it can be counted. However, that 2% margin of yours seems a bit low. It may not meet your company’s technical specifications.
Reply #42015-07-07
From a design perspective, it’s not feasible because the margin is too small
Reply #52015-07-08
This probably won’t work; I usually leave a reinforcement margin of around 10% when making holes, as 2% is too small
Reply #62015-07-09
I think it’s fine; it would be better to increase the thickness a bit more.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.