The severe accident that occurred in Tianjin on August 12 has led to the removal of confidentiality from safety assessment documents, and making such documents publicly available will become the norm.
Thread Content
This post was last edited by ningyong58 on 2015-8-21 at 14:35. On August 20, an article in China Youth Daily titled \"The ‘high-ranking intermediaries’ in the Tianjin Port explosion incident\" pointed out that the safety assessment agency involved in this incident had **connections behind it**. However, by observing the numerous unwritten rules in the field of safety assessment, it is evident that it is common for such assessment agencies to have influential backgrounds, and safety assessment has even become a means for companies and relevant administrative agencies to make money. Make the safety assessment documents no longer confidential. Publicly displaying it on the functional department’s website for a long time is the only solution. http://i1.itc.cn/20150820/360f_a08a8051_0c32_ed99_d844_e83290111767_1.jpg Click for today’s issue No. 1700: Political and commercial collusion behind safety assessments – Sohu News http://news.sohu.com/s2015/dianji-1700/index.shtml
Inside this, you understand, I understand, he understands too
Inside this, you understand, I understand, he understands too
Public safety assessment. Safety assessments should not be classified as confidential documents; it also serves as a form of oversight for the assessment agencies
Is it really necessary to write it so clearly? Everyone understands it: without the explosion at Tianjin Port, who would care?
The evaluation agency simply copies the information from the process package and makes the changes as requested by the client. . . If you’re worried about not being able to explain things clearly during the meeting, bring along the process package provider and the design institute as well. I make money by relying on connections. . .
I sincerely hope that the central inspection team will sort out all of this; waiting......
Everyone, you have a serious misunderstanding regarding safety assessment. I don’t deny that there are many evaluators whose competence is low, but safety evaluation isn’t what people say it to be. Many technical issues need to be raised in safety assessments, and safety assessment is also a technical process. The reason for involving process engineers during the safety assessment review is that safety assessors cannot be overly familiar with the processes; the members of the assessment team need to have an understanding of these processes, which is why professionals are brought in to participate.
Don’t believe or spread rumors; wait patiently for the results to be announced.
You shouldn’t look for process engineers during meetings; you should do so while writing the documents.
It’s something that experts need to know in great detail, when safety assessment personnel are unable to provide an answer. . It is unrealistic to expect safety assessment personnel to have a thorough understanding of the process.