Do you think Bently’s monitoring system is very effective?
Thread Content
Bently’s monitoring system is primarily used to measure the vibration of rotating equipment. Do you think this monitoring system is useful in everyday production? Thank you!
Bently’s monitoring systems are primarily used to measure the vibration of rotating equipment; everyone uses them, whether they’re useful or not.
Of course, it is extremely important that vibration displacement, as well as overspeed protection signals, be included in the interlock system for shutting down the unit equipment. Of course, to save money, there are cheap alternatives similar to BENTLY available in China, but their reliability and failure rates are not comparable to those of BENTLY.
Is that usually provided by the vehicle manufacturer itself, packaged by an ITCC integrator, or purchased separately by the owner?
It depends on who will handle the control configuration of the unit. Shenmu has its own automation company, and they can provide a complete package solution ； If Conixen is tasked with handling ITCC, BENTLY is usually included in their contract package. Of course, the owner can also carry out a separate tender, in which case the configuration and commissioning of BENTLY will be done by GE BENTLY’s engineers.
Thank you! 1. So which situation is more common these days? 2. If it is the unit configuration party that handles the packaging, does the owner usually specify Bently for vibration monitoring to be included in the package? Or should it be decided by the crew configuration party?
As far as I know, there are many manufacturers of status instruments – domestic, imported, and joint-venture ones. For large imported units, the condition report is usually provided along with the main unit ； Speed, vibration, runout, displacement – there’s work to be done. I have to leave.