Thread Content
Due to the limitations imposed by the elevation of the coal slurry preparation floor, in order to increase the storage and handling capacity of the coal silos, one grinder is associated with four silos. How should weighing feeders be arranged in such a situation to ensure optimal performance? Has any manufacturer set it up this way?
I guess your setup is unique in history, with nothing like it before or since! !
We also think it will make operations inconvenient in the future, but we can’t change the boss’s approach; it seems they did this already when building the power plant; Creative thinking :)
Haven’t seen it. . You guys are quite advanced! We have one coal bin corresponding to one feeder
Saving a little money results in big losses. After all, equipment investment is a one-time expense; stable operation over a long period is the key to saving money and making profits. If the initial design is poor, the costs of subsequent modifications will be even higher; it’s certainly not worth taking the risk of machine downtime and associated losses just for an investment of a few million
There are always typos. For example, “ji qian wang” should be “nearly ten million”. There have been far too many such instances; I hope the poster can take this as a lesson. Such opinions need to be upheld; you might get criticized at first, but the boss will thank you later
It takes some courage to embrace new things
Move a little after weighing. . . . . . . . . . . .
Due to limitations in floor elevation, is it not possible to raise the area above the coal bin slightly?
It should be feasible to have one grinder corresponding to four coal bins, but it’s not clear whether this is necessary! ! ! In principle, the outlet of the weighing feeder should be directly opposite the inlet of the mill! ! ! Keep the distance as short as possible! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Such a design is actually feasible as well. The coal discharge opening needs to be changed; it should be a fan-shaped opening.