Thread Content
To save space, vertical ones would be better, right? I kindly ask all fellow sailors to share their insights.
In a certain refinery’s diesel hydrogenation process, the high-pressure section is vertical while the low-pressure section is horizontal; Wax oil hydrogenation high-pressure fractionation process, all vertical
From the perspective of gas-liquid separation as the desired outcome, it is the best criterion for selection; the others are merely secondary factors
On Leng Gao Fen, everything shown is in a lying position. What is seen in the high-temperature area is all forces; there are things that are in a horizontal position and those that are in a vertical position
All are vertical type. 1. There is sufficient space for gas-liquid phase separation. 2. A factor in determining whether equipment investment can be reduced
This post was last edited by crazymoonman on 2015-10-24 at 11:55. We have a hot-high-score process here; hot-high scores, cold-high scores, and hot-low scores are all vertical, while cold-low scores are horizontal. Additionally, I personally always believe that horizontal tanks are better for oil-water separation, while vertical tanks are less efficient in this regard.
Here, for high and high-temperature models, they are all vertical; while for low-temperature models, they are horizontal types with a water separation tank
In fact, during the design phase, full consideration must be given to the spatial layout, as a vertical design can save a great deal of space.
Most of those I’ve seen are vertical, and some lubricating oil hydrogenation light fractions are horizontal. Most of them are vertical now, right?
High scores tend to be vertical, while low scores are commonly either vertical or horizontal