Major issues in desulfurization design
Thread Content
I just calculated that the amount of water carried in at the flue gas inlet is greater than that at the outlet; this is probably because the outlet temperature is low, so less water is carried away when it reaches saturation. But does that mean there’s no need to hydrate?
These numbers aren’t very convincing, lol
Enter that entrance? At the inlet of the desulfurization tower? It’s explained too simply; I can’t understand it. What’s the dry method? Wet hair?
I don’t understand what LZ wants to express
In wet flue gas desulfurization, the water content in the flue gas at the inlet of the desulfurization tower is higher than that in the flue gas at the outlet (the amount at the outlet corresponds to 50 degrees of saturated water vapor). What caused it? I understand it’s due to the low outlet temperature, as well as too much water coming in from the inlet – in other words, too high moisture content in the coal
This situation is unlikely to occur; in addition to gaseous water, the outlet also contains water mist as well as water combined with other substances. What do you think?
In addition to the water carried away by the flue gas, water lost through evaporation in the water tanks and from desulfurization by-products such as gypsum also needs to be taken into consideration
It’s troublesome when there’s no need to add water. The wastewater needs to be discharged outside. . . Difficult to handle!