HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Why is desulfurization not carried out first in absorption stabilization and light hydrocarbon recovery in the petrochemical industry

2015-12-17View Original

Thread Content

In the process flows of the petrochemical industry, absorption and stabilization are generally carried out first, followed by desulfurization of dry gas and liquefied gas. Why isn’t desulfurization done first and then absorption and stabilization? Won’t desulfurization first save a lot of investment in the material selection for subsequent equipment?
Reply #22015-12-17
Desulfurization cannot be carried out first; a large amount of components with a carbon number of 3 or higher are volatilized along with hydrogen sulfide, which affects the yield as well as the operation of downstream units
Reply #32015-12-17
The downstream unit has a flash tank that can flash off light hydrocarbons.
Reply #42015-12-17
The flash tank also flashes off hydrogen sulfide along with components above C3
Reply #52015-12-17
Acidic gas entrainment severely affects the operation of sulfur recovery; in severe cases, it can lead to the shutdown of the sulfur recovery unit
Reply #62015-12-17
Following the standard procedure, the desulfurization of liquefied gas inherently introduces some light hydrocarbons into the amine solution, and these can only be removed through flashing. The same principle applies when light hydrocarbons are introduced as a result of desulfurization first and then need to be removed via flashing; generally, the light hydrocarbons obtained through flashing are absorbed again by the amine solution. Therefore, the hydrogen sulfide emitted should remain within controllable levels. To date, no such process in which desulfurization is carried out first followed by absorption stabilization has been seen in China, and it’s not clear why the reverse approach doesn’t work
Reply #72015-12-20
I think there must be a reason for such a setup; we can consider the question from a different perspective – what are the advantages of separating first and then removing sulfur? Separating the components first makes desulfurization relatively easier and more thorough ; If desulfurization is done first, the subsequent processes will be more complex and harder to control.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.