Thread Content
Recently, I have come into frequent contact with physical scale prevention and removal devices, including those for circulating water as well as those for reverse osmosis! Many domestic companies report that the results are not good, but when I went abroad I found that many companies achieve good results using it; some have been using it for as long as 20 years. I introduced a piece of foreign equipment – do you think it can be used in China? Could everyone give some advice? :)
Why didn’t anyone come and let me know?
Provide descaling services, or recommend descaling equipment products? Are there detailed instructions?
The equipment is one aspect; what’s key is service management
Equipment products that serve to remove scale while replacing some scale inhibitors
Yes, if it’s not managed well, even the best things are useless!
The weather abroad, as well as the water there, is better than in our country. The equipment abroad is of high quality, but it may not be suitable for use here. Ongoing maintenance definitely involves significant costs.
There are no costs for subsequent maintenance; what matters now is the performance!
Sure, you can message me privately. I am working on similar projects; my QQ number is 504564224. Please mention electronic scale inhibition
It has to be said that physical water treatment equipment does have some effect, but the water quality abroad is different from that in China. The same is true for the physical water treatment equipment we sell; it can completely replace chemicals abroad, but not in China, and it doesn’t work even when tried in Taiwan. There are over 340 types of physical water treatment equipment available worldwide, but none of them can provide quantitative results; no product, whether qualitative or quantitative, can replace chemical agents. Indeed, many manufacturers offer electrochemical or adsorption-based solutions, but after consulting various users, it turned out that these solutions don’t work – they may function well at first, but eventually stop working. Chemical treatment methods have dominated for so many years, giving rise to an entire set of systems, various metrics, theories, and so on. If physical water treatment equipment also relies on the theories and metrics of chemical agents to carry out its functions, it is essentially seeking its own destruction. There are many claims made about quantum rings, with exaggerated statements about their benefits – such as increased rice yields and fish production. It’s true that quantum rings do have some effect, but this effect cannot be quantified. They do work to some extent in enclosed environments, but they are ineffective in large-scale or open systems.
Physical treatment methods represent the trend in water treatment. The competitor of physical treatment methods is not chemical treatment methods, but rather the unique domestic business environment; this is the main reason why these methods work well abroad but are difficult to implement in China. We have too many marketing success stories – it’s hard to describe them all in just a few words. Of course, there are many manufacturers whose products work very well for us, and the vast majority of them are private enterprises. State-owned enterprises are too complicated.