HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Case analysis: Should the following situation be classified as a work-related injury? (6)

2016-03-08View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by slll611 on 2016-3-9 at 20:45. Due to the diversity and complexity of real life, many injuries lead to different outcomes; some people receive compensation through their employer’s work-related injury insurance, while others settle matters privately. As for how to safeguard the interests of the parties involved, several such cases will be selected for discussion to assess everyone’s understanding of work-related injuries; the results will be announced in a week. Everyone is welcome to participate in the debate; all participants will receive a reward, with extra prizes for those who can offer unique perspectives and detailed explanations. @zxz017 @LVZBMAN @hnan @wamj6566@*anpangpang @hanyu*a8 @NoRegrets @StorageAndTransportTorch @GuanGongYu @yu3606 @*aojiaoya0546 @FishInTheDesert @B0SS @LinLinShangShang @SulfurZincAluminum @IceAgeSnowTracing @soul_BOY_young @zxj5048386 @LiuFei @RecallingTheThreeKingdomsLiu. Case details: Cheng, an employee of a construction company in a certain city, accidentally injured his right hand while operating a mixer at a construction site on January 6, 2012. He was discharged from the hospital after completing treatment on March 20. On May 5, the city’s social insurance authorities determined that Cheng’s injury was work-related. On August 16, the company reached an agreement with Cheng whereby it would pay him 30,000 yuan in compensation. Subsequently, on September 6 of that year, Cheng filed an arbitration application with the municipal labor dispute arbitration committee, asserting his rights to work-related injury insurance benefits. Cheng believed that his injuries were severe, that the compensation offered by the company was insufficient, and that his legitimate rights and interests had been violated. The employer believes that it has reached an agreement with Mr. Cheng under which the company will pay 30,000 yuan in compensation, and therefore should not bear any further responsibility. Don’t forget to reply after voting, otherwise you won’t get the reward. For evaluation criteria, refer to: http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-1556795-1-1.html
Reply #22016-03-08
If the compensation is too low, it is invalid! An application for work-related injury recognition can be filed within 1 year of the injury. According to the Supreme People’s Court’s \"Interpretations (III) on Several Issues Concerning the Application of Law in the Trial of Labor Dispute Cases,\" if the agreement reached between the employee and the employer involves a significant misunderstanding or is clearly unfair, the court shall support the party’s request to revoke such agreement.
Reply #32016-03-08
Arbitration should be sought, and the company should assume further responsibility.
Reply #42016-03-08
If the injury is severe and the compensation is too low, arbitration should be sought.
Reply #52016-03-08
The employee’s request is legitimate.
Reply #62016-03-08
If the compensation is below the stipulated amount, arbitration should be sought;
Reply #72016-03-09
Due to severe injuries, inadequate compensation, and within the applicable time frame, arbitration should be sought; The company should increase the compensation.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.