HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

What are the career progression paths in chemical equipment design? What do you think?

2016-03-16View Original

Thread Content

I just graduated and have been working in chemical equipment design for a short time, mainly focusing on static equipment and horizontal equipment. There are the most people specializing in equipment design in our team, more than those in process engineering or instrumentation; meanwhile, there are the fewest people in electrical and instrumentation fields. However, at present, after working for a few years and gaining experience with PLCs, professionals in instrumentation can earn over 200,000 yuan per year (in Shanghai), and they are in high demand. It seems that professionals in equipment design are not as sought-after, especially those dealing with static equipment. Although the work in this field is tough and complex, what do those who are more experienced think about the future prospects of equipment design? Is it necessary to improve one’s skills by obtaining certifications or by studying standards and regulations carefully?
Reply #22016-03-16
Class of 2016? The 2016 unemployment crisis!
Reply #32016-03-16
It’s okay. I’m from the class of 2015; my juniors from the class of 2016 have all managed to find great jobs
Reply #42016-03-16
Those who are overconfident but incompetent are hard to find. In fact, good jobs rely on opportunity, not necessarily on skill.
Reply #52016-03-16
Opportunity + Effort + Persistence~~~~
Reply #62016-03-17
I specialize in this field. The technical complexity of it isn’t very high, but when it comes to the more technically demanding aspects, one needs to rely on many other factors. If you simply focus on designing mechanical containers, the future prospects for such work aren’t very good. If you want to do this work well and to a high standard, it’s necessary to take into account process calculations. In fact, to excel in this field, one must consider piping systems, manufacturing processes, as well as the mechanical strength of the components involved. It’s also a field that serves as a link between different areas.
Reply #72016-03-17
Compared to process piping, static equipment does seem less important than dynamic equipment. Moreover, if one wants to delve deeper into this field, it requires a lot of other specialized knowledge as well; it’s quite difficult. It’s really sad not to have such opportunities
Reply #82016-03-27
I’ve worked on static equipment for over two years; now I want to work with rotating equipment, but I don’t know how to get such an opportunity

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.