What are the advantages of high-tower compound fertilizer over drum compound fertilizer? What is the theoretical basis?

The utilization rate of conventional fertilizers is mainly related to methods of application, soil properties, etc. There is no need for drying, which results in lower energy consumption; however, this does not offer any advantages for crops. It is necessary to consider the utilization rates of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium separately. What is generally referred to here is the utilization rate of nitrogen. In fact, different crops have varying capacities for absorbing nutrients. Some data suggest that the nutrient utilization rate of blended fertilizers is reduced by 5%-10%, but these figures are limited and not widely accepted. It has long been believed that blended fertilizers have a higher nutrient utilization rate than single-element fertilizers, and there is data to support this view, though there are also many opposing opinions. The conclusion that using them together can improve utilization rate is likely correct. There is data showing that using ammonia nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen together can improve the utilization rate of nitrogen. Is the drum also used for applying fertilizers in this way? Its effect on crops should be similar to that of the high tower, right? Nitro-based fertilizers are fast-acting, while urea-based fertilizers are primarily related to soil urease; the efficiency of urease is dependent on soil temperature. In winter, urea does not undergo transformation in the soil of the north, and plant roots do not absorb urea nitrogen; unless additives are used, high-tower fertilizers will not prolong the release of nutrients