HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Analysis of the reasons why two types of turbines in the air separation unit burn thrust bearings twice every six months

2016-04-06View Original

Thread Content

The air separation plant is equipped with two sets of 43,000 capacity air separation units, which were put into operation successively in October 2011. The air compressor is driven by a turbine; these turbines are all single-cylinder extraction condensing turbines of the ENAKS50/71/32 model. The steam inlet pressure is 9.1 MPa, the extraction pressure is 4.1 MPa, the output power is 36,421 kW, and the operating speed is 4,690 rpm. Among them, the turbine of the North Set compressor unit experienced an unexpected incident of thrust bearing damage in 2015, after the turbine wheel chamber pressure increased twice due to severe scaling ; Under basically identical operating conditions, the turbine of the South Unit showed, in the later stages, that the opening of the high-pressure control valve had reached its limit, the operating speed dropped to 4,552 revolutions per minute, and the turbine’s output became severely insufficient; however, no problem with burning out the thrust bearings occurred. When comparing the two units, the reason cited for the continuous bearing wear in the turbine of the northern unit was increased axial force due to scaling; however, the evidence and rationale provided are insufficient.
Reply #22016-04-07
This is my number 513242480; can we communicate?
Reply #32016-04-07
Is there a mistake with your pressure readings? Why is the pressure for condensing type air intake and exhaust so high? . . We have also encountered issues with steam quality; the single-axis bearing is fine.
Reply #42016-04-08
I didn’t mention the exhaust pressure in my text; where did you see it?
Reply #52016-04-08
I didn’t mention the exhaust pressure in my text; where did you see it?
Reply #62016-04-08
Let’s communicate here first, if you’d like.
Reply #72016-04-09
I’m sorry. The description is incorrect; I’m referring to the exhaust pressure. I’ve never encountered a condensing unit with such high pressure; I’m a bit curious. . . Could you give some advice? Hehe

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.