HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Transmitter for measuring negative pressure

2016-04-08View Original

Thread Content

Negative pressure of 98 KP, temperature of 97 degrees, plug-in diaphragm box; are there any records of measurements taken using Rosemount pressure transmitters? Let’s share some other good experiences.
Reply #22016-04-08
This post was last edited by Perfey on 2016-4-8 at 10:17. Can it be measured using a differential pressure transmitter? Is the high voltage terminal connected to the atmosphere, and the low voltage terminal to the point under test? I’m not sure if it’s possible.
Reply #32016-04-08
I think it shouldn’t be possible. I’m not sure about vacuum gauges; a special selection process is required
Reply #42016-04-08
Since you are dealing with absolute vacuum, an absolute pressure gauge is the only option
Reply #52016-04-08
Well, if you want Rossmont’s performance figures, go talk to their sales team; they definitely have them.
Reply #62016-04-08
Only absolute pressure transmitters can be used; it would be best if you specified the insertion depth of the transmitter: lol
Reply #72016-04-08
An absolute pressure transmitter can be used; there are many available to search for online...
Reply #82016-04-08
This post was last edited by ウ① How ゞ on 2016-4-8 19:32. A Rosemount gauge pressure transmitter with an insertable diaphragm can be used, and DC200 silicone oil will work fine. However, attention must be paid to the insertion depth, dimensions, diaphragm material, and flange standard
Reply #92016-04-09
A regular differential pressure transmitter cannot replace a negative pressure gauge. This is because, under normal conditions, the membrane box of a differential pressure transmitter is manufactured in a condition where it is under pressure. Negative pressure, on the other hand, is the external movement of the diaphragm box. Over time, oil leakage from the diaphragm box will occur. Therefore, it’s okay to use it occasionally for emergency purposes, but for long-term measurements, a proper vacuum gauge must be used.
Reply #102016-04-09
For the operating conditions described by the poster, Rosemount will definitely be fine.
Reply #112016-04-09
The Rosemont model works very well; it operates at -100 to 0 KPA. We use it in the evaporation section of our urea system, where the pressure is also -98 KPA. There are also those from Yamaki, but they’re just average.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.