What are your thoughts on the \"4.22\" fire accident in Jingjiang, Jiangsu? !
Thread Content
Everyone may already be aware of the fire and explosion accident that occurred at Deqiao Warehousing Co., Ltd. in Jingjiang, Jiangsu on April 22nd, through various media. What are your thoughts? Know each other? Control measures, fire extinguishing methods, evacuation, and so on – feel free to discuss them openly. It’s a purely technical discussion; no complaints allowed
An accident has occurred; there must be a problem.
For special operations in chemical enterprises, it is essential to follow the provisions outlined in GB30871 strictly, and safety measures must be implemented thoroughly.
It was caused by illegal hot work. Specific details will be covered in subsequent reports.
In the afternoon, black smoke reached me; it seems there aren’t any fire pumps around the oil tank
It was caused by illegal hot work operations again. First, we need to attach importance to it at the ideological level, and then operate in accordance with the rules and regulations
1. It was a joint liability accident. 2. It belongs to a work safety accident.
1. Most safety accidents are caused by human error; for now, there are only rumors that they were resulting from illegal use of fire； There have been many similar accidents as well. In my opinion, the reasons for such frequent incidents need to be analyzed from various perspectives: companies bear significant responsibility. It is reported that following the August 12 accident in Tianjin, a meeting was held there with the key executives of enterprises involved in high-risk activities; the manager of Jiangsu Deqiao Warehousing Co., Ltd. delivered a report on his work at that meeting, and together with more than 30 other enterprises, they signed commitments regarding safe production. On March 10 this year, Zhu Xiaobo, the director of the local work safety supervision bureau, went to Jiangsu Deqiao Warehousing Co., Ltd., which is under his oversight, for an on-site inspection. He examined in detail the surveillance systems, safety protection facilities, and emergency rescue equipment in the company’s key storage areas, and offered suggestions regarding the company’s safety measures. It is evident that the company has not truly learned from the Tianjin accident, and there are significant gaps in the approval process for hot work ； On the other hand, it may be largely related to the workers who perform welding tasks: specific analysis should be conducted from these aspects: the entry requirements for welders are too low ； (This has led to many welders who are only aware of the dangers associated with working with fire; they’re not quite clear about what exactly those dangers are or why they exist.) ； Of course, it is closely related to the regular education provided by the company.) ； 2. After an accident, it is also expected that I will be objective regarding it: Why does an accident always have an impact on the environment? Is that really the case?
Participated in the video conference. Accidents like this are a systemic issue; they wouldn’t occur if any single link is properly controlled.
The report mentions illegal welding work~~ How exactly is it illegal? ~~
It was caused by illegal hot work; hot work is strictly regulated. The main responsibility lies with the leadership.