HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Questions about whether a building code requirement of less than 5% can lower the fire protection rating? ? ? Urgent! Urgent! Urgent! Urgent! ! !

2016-05-19View Original

Thread Content

There is a provision in the building codes stating that when the proportion of such area is less than 5%, the fire protection rating can be reduced. My questions are: 1. If the entire area was originally classified as a non-Class A area (and now Class A storage tanks or installations need to be placed within that 5% area), then does reducing the rating mean that those Class A elements within that 5% area are downgraded to Class B? . . Does it still mean that the entire area is classified as Category A simply because Category A storage tanks are located there, but once the area constitutes less than 5%, the fire protection rating of the entire area can be reduced? ? ? What exactly does it mean? ? 2. If it refers to the second option, does it still need to be designed as a Category A facility even if the percentage is within 5% (i.e., are firewalls and explosion relief areas required)? Can the fire protection rating of other areas within the entire plant area be reduced? 3. Which provision determines the fire separation distance between Class A installations and other installations within the entire area, to be within 3–5%? 4. Which regulation determines the fire separation distance between the entire plant area and other plants or buildings? Thank you!
Reply #22016-05-19
The entire area was originally classified as Category A due to the presence of Category A storage tanks, but once the area occupied by Category A items is less than 5%, the fire protection classification for the entire area can be set at a lower level; in other words, it remains the same category as before. Those within 5% should preferably be designed as Category A (firewalls, explosion relief areas, etc. should be installed). For Class A installations with a fire risk of 5% or less, the fire separation distance from other installations in the entire area is determined based on the process requirements. The fire separation distance between the entire plant area and other plants or buildings is determined according to the lower category, that is, the original category.
Reply #32016-05-19
For example, if an original fire compartment is classified as Category C and contains a Category A production area, then as long as the area of the Category A area is less than 5% of the total area, this fire compartment is still designed according to Category C standards.
Reply #42016-05-19
An example will make it clearer. If a workshop is classified as a Class C area, but a small section within it covering 5% of its total area uses Class A materials, then the entire facility remains classified as Class C. However, the design of that 5% area designated for Class A materials follows the requirements for Class A areas, while the other aspects of the facility’s design, such as explosion protection, fire safety measures, and spacing requirements, remain in line with those for Class C areas
Reply #52016-05-19
““For Class A installations, the fire separation distance from other installations within the same area shall be determined according to the process requirements, as long as it is within 5%.” Does this fire safety code establish any mandatory requirements regarding fire separation distances? Does \"process determined\" mean there are no restrictions? ? ? ?
Reply #62016-05-19
Sir, which regulation determines the fire separation distance between Class A devices with a percentage of 5% or less and other devices in the entire area? How is it specified?
Reply #72016-05-19
There shouldn’t be such a thing as a fire separation distance within a zone; it should rather be the spacing required for the process layout. It seems that there are no specific regulations regarding this, as long as the requirements for the process layout are met, that’s sufficient
Reply #82016-05-19
Current fire protection codes do not impose mandatory requirements regarding fire separation distances. Determining the process means simply leaving enough space in accordance with principles such as the layout of chemical equipment. It should be noted that according to the regulations, effective fire prevention measures must be taken to ensure that in the event of an accident, the fire cannot spread to other areas, as well as in those production areas where there is a high risk of fire. This is also why it is best to design it as Category A when the percentage is within 5% (firewalls, explosion relief areas, etc. need to be installed).
Reply #92016-05-21
So if I use a small volume, less than 100L, but the area of use is more than 5%, can the entire factory be treated at a lower rate?
Reply #102016-05-21
If the volume used is small, less than 100L, but the area of use is greater than 5%. In accordance with Article 3.1.2 and its interpretations of building codes, the entire factory building can also be treated at a lower level.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.