Toluene exhaust emissions exceed limits
Thread Content
Company A has only one outlet for emitting toluene emissions, and excessive emissions often occur there; however, the total daily emission volume is well below the specified limit. Is it possible to modify the system by adding two outlets in order to dilute the emissions? If so, how should this be done? I’d like to hear everyone’s opinions!
How great it is to recover condensation – it’s both environmentally friendly and cost-saving. Aren’t we all striving to create organizations that are environmentally conscious and efficient these days?
Not recommended! Emission standards are becoming increasingly strict; it’s better to use equipment for treatment.
Are there any online monitoring devices needed for toluene and total volatile organic compounds other than methane? Manager Deng: 18392002848, QQ: 1771384510
Where is the original poster from? Let us take care of it for you? bxl025@126.com
The approach suggested by the original poster of using two exhaust outlets is likely incorrect; the total amount of emissions still exceeds the allowed limits. Such a method is intended to avoid risks. Secondly, it is our responsibility to protect the environment, and it is also the best legacy we can leave for future generations
Diluting emissions is not recommended. Policy monitoring is becoming increasingly strict; both from a social responsibility perspective and in terms of environmental standards, it is necessary to ensure that both the total amount and concentration meet the required levels before discharge. There should be no problem with the governance technology. Dear experts in environmental protection from Haiyou, could you please offer some advice? I’d also like to learn about your company’s manufacturing process
Changing it to two exits as mentioned above only alters the appearance. This may have been synchronized with security environment monitoring. Not much toluene needs to be removed; it is recommended to use highly active carbon for adsorption. Two can be set up, with one as a backup
This post was last edited by autumnlee on 2016-9-30 at 10:20. It is recommended to use activated carbon fibers for adsorption and recovery, which allows for compliance with emission standards while also enabling recycling. The company I work for specializes in VOCs control, and we have installed over 60 sets of activated carbon fibers.
You didn’t explain it clearly. What do you mean by “excessive emissions often occur, but the daily total emissions are far below the specified limit”? From my understanding, it means that the emission concentration is excessive, but the amount of emissions is not? **Local standards don’t include any assessment indicators such as the total daily emissions; you need to analyze the situation yourself first to figure out what’s going on, so that everyone can help you make a judgment. It is advised that people from environmental protection companies should not readily recommend certain equipment; they shouldn’t start installing things here and there without first understanding everything thoroughly.