Environmental tax is approaching; fertilizer companies see further acceleration in capacity reduction

Thread Content

On August 29, the 20th meeting of the 12th REN Conference considered the \"Environmental Protection Tax Law (Draft)\". The draft proposes to replace the current \"pollution discharge fees\" with an \"environmental protection tax\", using the existing standards for such fees as the minimum amount for the environmental protection tax. It specifies that the pollutants subject to taxation include four categories: air pollutants, water pollutants, solid waste, and noise. The draft sets the current standards for pollution discharge fees as the minimum amount for the environmental protection tax, stipulating that the tax on air pollutants is 1.2 yuan per pollution equivalent ； The cost for water pollutants is 1.4 yuan ； Depending on the type, the tax on solid waste ranges from 5 yuan to 1,000 yuan per ton ； The tax amount ranges from 350 yuan to 11,200 yuan per month, depending on the number of decibels by which the noise exceeds the allowed level. 　　In July 2003, China began to fully implement the Regulations on the Collection and Use of Pollution Discharge Fees. According to the regulations, polluters must pay the corresponding pollution fees in accordance with relevant rules. The pollution discharge fees must be included in the financial budget and managed as special funds for environmental protection, which are primarily used for controlling key pollution sources and addressing regional pollution issues. However, previous industry reports indicated that over the years there have been issues such as a narrow scope of pollution fee collection, excessively low collection standards, insufficient enforcement efforts, low efficiency in collection, and a lack of necessary enforcement measures. Therefore, the \"pollution fee\" that has been in use for many years is about to be phased out, and an environmental protection tax is set to take its place. It is reported that the taxpayers of this environmental protection tax will be enterprises, and it is also enterprises that will be most affected by it. After the introduction of the environmental protection tax, two types of enterprises are likely to be significantly affected: first, those that previously did not pay pollution fees in a proper manner will face increased mandatory oversight in the future ； Secondly, industries where pollutants are easy to measure, such as the paper and chemical industries, will face greater pressure in the future. 　　What impact will the implementation of this draft have on the fertilizer industry? The purpose of formulating environmental protection laws is to fundamentally address the various shortcomings of the existing pollution discharge fee system, in order to create an environment that fosters fair competition and accelerates the phasing out of outdated production capacities. As is well known, the main reason for the sluggish market for fertilizers in these two years has been overcapacity, with rapid increases in production of various types of fertilizers. The implementation of an environmental protection tax will help to eliminate outdated production capacities, thereby driving the fertilizer industry in the direction of lower costs and greater environmental sustainability. 　　The environmental protection tax will become a \"sword of Damocles\" hanging over fertilizer production enterprises. In the short term, the imposition of an environmental protection tax will increase the tax burden on fertilizer companies. However, in the long run, this is good news for the entire industry. Currently, the fertilizer industry is characterized by market chaos, frequent price wars, fierce competition, and the presence of counterfeit and substandard products that disrupt the market. By strengthening environmental regulations, it will be possible to accelerate the elimination of outdated production capacities, promote energy conservation and emission reduction, facilitate technological upgrades within the industry, and support its transformation and development. Additionally, the main cause of the chaos in the fertilizer market at present is the large number of small enterprises. These small firms often lack the funds to invest in environmental protection equipment, and under pressure due to costs, some of them end up using substandard products, thereby disrupting the market. If stricter environmental regulations are implemented and those enterprises that fail to comply with these rules are forced to shut down, then only the best companies will remain to compete fairly, which will serve as a driving force for the healthy development of the fertilizer industry. 　　In any case, an environmental tax is coming – it’s not a hoax. The environmental issues faced by fertilizer manufacturers are obstacles that cannot be ignored. Although the impact of such regulations on the industry will depend on the enforcement efforts of the relevant authorities once they are put in place, we still need to make all the necessary preparations in advance.