Please discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using dip pipes for filling liquid chlorine, as well as the origin of the use of dip pipes.
Thread Content
Personally, I think flexible hoses are better than flexi-hoses. What do you all think?
What material should a hose be made of to ensure long-term corrosion resistance? And what voltage tolerance is required to meet the standards?
Before the use of flexi-hoses, soft hoses were used; it was only after leaks occurred due to the bursting of those soft hoses that the use of flexi-hoses became more widespread.
From a safety perspective, the selection of a flexible hose is the right choice, but from a practical usage standpoint, installing a hose is more convenient. From a safety-first perspective at present, a flexible hose is a wise choice.
Could you talk about the history of using flexible hoses, that is, **the process of regulations and requirements being issued by relevant authorities?
This post was last edited by Rotating arm on 2016-10-8 at 21:48. For the loading and unloading of liquid chlorine, flexible hoses are mostly used now; the technology has improved significantly compared to three years ago. Previously, the seals had to be replaced several times a month, but thanks to technological advancements, the main seal only needs to be replaced every six months. Now, an additional seal has been added, so the main seal will not need to be replaced for a whole year.
The patented hose for liquid chlorine produced by Lianyungang Aide Petrochemical Company has successfully solved the problem of leaks, with no need to replace the seal for two years!