Improve the description and content of the automatic payroll system
Thread Content
The automatic payroll system is a good attempt, but with the next payday approaching, there are still many contradictions in the various instructions provided by the payroll system. Here is a list: 1. “Sign-in successful. You have received 2 Wealth points today. In total, you have signed in 20 times; for every additional 3 sign-ins, the sign-in reward increases by 1.” ”This is the reward for signing in today. The statement \"The reward value increases by 1 for every 3 sign-ins\" doesn’t make any sense, as the reward amount remains 2 wealth all the time. 2. The method for calculating wages in the “Wage Management Record”: Based on your work performance, it is estimated that you will receive 709.5 Wealth from 2016-11-01 to 2016-12-01 (Note: number of periods)
1. The system is designed this way; it’s not clear why it didn’t work, but this part can be removed. 2. The theme was developed later on separately; display and sending are two separate systems. This theme isn’t taken into account during display, but it will be included when sending. This one is marked with the note 3; this involves manual review. 4. As indicated in point 3, this month is the first month when the actual value has been reduced, but the notification states that calculations should be based on value 30.
The Easter egg of smashing watermelons – why do you have so many things to do? All they know is how to cause trouble for their bosses. :lol
In topic 4, does topic 30 count as a main topic or as both a main topic and a reply?
You talk so much; you can’t compare to me, right? :lol
I’m properly replying here; I’ve already received today’s reward. Online gift pack received; participation value + wealth. - Powered by Discuz! http://bbs.hcbbs.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=1644589&page=1#pid17050709
The formula states (score + read), but in reality it only calculates the score and does not take into account whether it has been read. “Of the total number of managers, the proportion of those who have reviewed the content and given positive feedback cannot exceed 40%, while the percentage of those who have given ratings must be above 30%. Based on the current data, this standard will result in around half of the managers not meeting these requirements. Either this system is too strict, or the message has not reached the management.